THF state fair grand champions??

Help Support Steer Planet:

hntwhitetail

Well-known member
Joined
Aug 11, 2010
Messages
1,455
I was wondering, were any of the state fair grand or reserve grand champions THF?  Been seeling a lot of Heat Wave or Monopoly winners, just wondering if any were THF? or have to be THC to have that "look".
 

vc

Well-known member
Joined
Jul 24, 2007
Messages
1,861
Location
So-Cal
I'm pretty sure the steers are not tested, the only way you would know if a steer was clean is if both parents were clean. And if it is a HW or Monopoly 50/50 chance there not clean.
 

knabe

Well-known member
Joined
Feb 7, 2007
Messages
13,646
Location
Hollister, CA
most people want a TH positive calf and would probably pay more for a verified carrier.

that's why people keep breeding carriers to carriers to increase the odds of a carrier because 50% simply is not enough.
 

Okotoks

Well-known member
Joined
Aug 17, 2010
Messages
3,085
Just more proof the show ring leads to some major insanity. Breeding two carriers means 25% of your calf crop would be a write off! I realise you would be planning on getting that back and more on the showable calves but ...................! Maybe judges should start learning the phenotype that carriers have .. oh I guess they already know that. Originally people took out steers to exhibit because they thought they would be the best carcass and thus advertise the bulls they were selling to produce the same type. Now it's like a glorified dog show circuit . I'm guessing most dog breeders have more integrity when it comes to genetic defects. I know dog breeders who have been testing and selecting against defects for years.
 

jaimiediamond

Well-known member
Joined
Aug 23, 2010
Messages
1,019
Location
Okotoks
Okotoks said:
Just more proof the show ring leads to some major insanity. Breeding two carriers means 25% of your calf crop would be a write off! I realise you would be planning on getting that back and more on the showable calves but ...................! Maybe judges should start learning the phenotype that carriers have .. oh I guess they already know that. Originally people took out steers to exhibit because they thought they would be the best carcass and thus advertise the bulls they were selling to produce the same type. Now it's like a glorified dog show circuit . I'm guessing most dog breeders have more integrity when it comes to genetic defects. I know dog breeders who have been testing and selecting against defects for years.

Actually on the dog show topic breeders are being black listed if they sell on dogs with known genetic defects.  Some breed associations are really smacking down.  I find it discouraging that the TH and PH phenotype is what we are actually getting ourselves stuck on.  I bred my carrier cows until I got free daughters and now use the carriers as recipient cows.  Every cow in our herd was tested we haven't sold any known carriers on as breeding stock.  I believe that as breeders we should try and maintain the integrity of our cattle because fads pass look at the 60s, 80s, and now the 00s.
 

jaimiediamond

Well-known member
Joined
Aug 23, 2010
Messages
1,019
Location
Okotoks
jaimiediamond said:
Okotoks said:
Just more proof the show ring leads to some major insanity. Breeding two carriers means 25% of your calf crop would be a write off! I realise you would be planning on getting that back and more on the showable calves but ...................! Maybe judges should start learning the phenotype that carriers have .. oh I guess they already know that. Originally people took out steers to exhibit because they thought they would be the best carcass and thus advertise the bulls they were selling to produce the same type. Now it's like a glorified dog show circuit . I'm guessing most dog breeders have more integrity when it comes to genetic defects. I know dog breeders who have been testing and selecting against defects for years.

Actually on the dog show topic breeders are being black listed if they sell on dogs with known genetic defects.  Some breed associations are really smacking down.  I find it discouraging that the TH and PH phenotype is what we are actually getting ourselves stuck on.  I bred my carrier cows until I got free daughters and now use the carriers as recipient cows.   Every cow in our herd was tested we haven't sold any known carriers on as breeding stock.  I believe that as breeders we should try and maintain the integrity of our cattle because fads pass look at the 60s, 80s, and now the 00s.

Just adding pictures to prove my point :) I did random searches of animals from each time frame and these are 3 examples.
 

Attachments

  • Untitled.png
    Untitled.png
    164.9 KB · Views: 1,209
  • titan.jpg
    titan.jpg
    32.5 KB · Views: 211
  • resboy.jpg
    resboy.jpg
    32 KB · Views: 194

chambero

Well-known member
Joined
Feb 12, 2007
Messages
3,207
Location
Texas
So, which of the three are more functional?

Therein lies the problem. What we breed for nowadays has its ugly extremes, but overall I don't see how anyone could say we aren't closer to more efficient animals as a whole than in past decades.  Show cattle are always going to be extreme examples - just like human beauty pageants.
 

jaimiediamond

Well-known member
Joined
Aug 23, 2010
Messages
1,019
Location
Okotoks
chambero said:
So, which of the three are more functional?

Therein lies the problem. What we breed for nowadays has its ugly extremes, but overall I don't see how anyone could say we aren't closer to more efficient animals as a whole than in past decades.  Show cattle are always going to be extreme examples - just like human beauty pageants.

I agree with you :) I am not stating which of these is more useful because at the time the animals shown were of type.  I am just pointing out that in 2020 we might have a totally different fad going on with our cattle and that breeding TH to TH for a higher chance of getting a TH carrier calf that has the phenotype that is winning today won't help anyone out in the long run. 
 

garybob

Well-known member
Joined
Feb 4, 2007
Messages
1,634
Location
NW Arkansas
Okotoks said:
Just more proof the show ring leads to some major insanity. Breeding two carriers means 25% of your calf crop would be a write off! I realise you would be planning on getting that back and more on the showable calves but ...................! Maybe judges should start learning the phenotype that carriers have .. oh I guess they already know that. Originally people took out steers to exhibit because they thought they would be the best carcass and thus advertise the bulls they were selling to produce the same type. Now it's like a glorified dog show circuit . I'm guessing most dog breeders have more integrity when it comes to genetic defects. I know dog breeders who have been testing and selecting against defects for years.
(thumbsup) (thumbsup) (thumbsup) (thumbsup)
In my humble Ozarkian opinion, TH and PHA carriers should be sent on a one-way trip to Tama, Iowa. That's my opinio0n, anyway, so take it for what it's worth.

GB
 

STEER_1981

Well-known member
Joined
Jun 1, 2010
Messages
68
What are the positive traits of a TH carrier?  Why are they even good in the show ring?
 

CCW

Well-known member
Joined
Jul 1, 2010
Messages
98
It would be interesting to see what percentage of the top 5 steers at the big shows are positive for TH? I'm guessing at least 80% are. Maybe someone needs to be in charge of researching this.
 

kp1625

Active member
Joined
May 18, 2010
Messages
42
Is the industry moving forward and suppling a better more efficient product than past decades?  It seems more like a science fair.  The purpose of raising cattle is to provide beef.  The purpose of putting cattle in the showring is to publicize your cattle.  I believe we need to get back to remembering why we are in this industry.  Producing a quality carcass on the hook.
 

Bradenh

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 10, 2010
Messages
2,646
Location
Central Texas
it may be surprising actually to find more of them that are thf and phaf because there are alot of "monopoly*" and alot of "heatwaves*" that arent. i bet theres alot of these calves that are supposedly sired by those bulls because they are the big names  and thats sorta in "style" to say you have a heatwave when its really another bull whose unproven jmo but i personally know it happens down here
 

knabe

Well-known member
Joined
Feb 7, 2007
Messages
13,646
Location
Hollister, CA
kp1625 said:
Is the industry moving forward and suppling a better more efficient product than past decades?  It seems more like a science fair.   The purpose of raising cattle is to provide beef.  The purpose of putting cattle in the showring is to publicize your cattle.  I believe we need to get back to remembering why we are in this industry.  Producing a quality carcass on the hook.

then, i think supporters ought to support that with money, prizes, judging.  perhaps have stands inside the locker.
 

chambero

Well-known member
Joined
Feb 12, 2007
Messages
3,207
Location
Texas
kp1625 said:
I believe we need to get back to remembering why we are in this industry.  Producing a quality carcass on the hook.

THE TYPE OF STEERS THAT WIN NOW ABSOLUTELY DO PRODUCE VERY HIGH QUALITY CARCASSES!  It is a complete fallacy for anyone to say that they don't.  Look up the carcass contest results that many of the big majors in this country have - for example Houston. Every single first and second place steer is slaughtered and judged.  As a group, any meat packer would love to have this group of carcasses to sell.

There are plenty of things to gripe about show steer production, but carcass quality isn't one of them.
 

ZNT

Well-known member
Joined
Apr 25, 2007
Messages
1,006
Location
Rhome, TX
knabe said:
that's why people keep breeding carriers to carriers to increase the odds of a carrier because 50% simply is not enough.

Sounds like more people need to take genetics class then.  Carrier to carrier only gets you 25% more dead ones.  50% is the best anyone can do, unless they are calculating on % of calves weaned that are carriers.  HAHA  Knabe, preaching to the choir on this one. 
 

knabe

Well-known member
Joined
Feb 7, 2007
Messages
13,646
Location
Hollister, CA
ZNT said:
  50% is the best anyone can do, unless they are calculating on % of calves weaned that are carriers.  HAHA   Knabe, preaching to the choir on this one. 

bingo!
 

Okotoks

Well-known member
Joined
Aug 17, 2010
Messages
3,085
knabe said:
ZNT said:
 50% is the best anyone can do, unless they are calculating on % of calves weaned that are carriers.  HAHA   Knabe, preaching to the choir on this one.  

bingo!
Definitely a case of more is not better! There was a guy at Agribtion last fall talking about breeding carriers to carriers as though he would get better results, same number of carriers but 25% dead calves!
 

Latest posts

Top