I read through this post and frankly I am amazed at the comments that some better cattlemen than I are making as to how well these bulls are cared for and how they should be looking so much better? Someone mentioned how these bulls led lives like kings. The truth is they live lives like slaves.
First, look at the picture of Sunseeker on the first page and then look at the picture at the top of this page. Doesn't even vaguely resemble the same bull."Massive" sure doesn't apply to that picture. Maybe because in the first picture he had been in stud for a longer period. These bulls are not fed to gain weight, they are fed at a level to promote semen production. If you have a bull in the pasture breeding cows he needs to be in good shape so he can travel and mount and have libido and all that requires energy. Not true in a bull stud. Amount of semen produced is a different measure than how many cows are bred in the pasture. When we used to take in "problem" donor cows, cows that had not been bred for a long period and would not produce eggs or fertile eggs, without exception those cows were FAT. The overwhelming majority would either breed or produce fertile eggs just by going on a diet and losing alot of weight. They looked really good, but they wouldn't produce. I saw 3C Macho a couple days after he came back from ABS the first time. He looked like he'd been eating snowballs for 6 months. Go see him now out in the pasture and he looks like a butter ball. Has nothing to do with natural fleshing ability. If you starve something, relatively speaking, it WILL lose weight. Look at that picture of poor old Heatwave. If he had no fleshing ability, as it certainly appears in the picture, how is it that he (and his some of his sons) is one of only a handful of clubby bulls that will actually ad body and depth and fleshing ability? And I realize that's not a constant, but consistency and clubby do not belong in the same sentence.
While some are collected by the teaser method, many are collected with an electro-ejaculator? Do you know how that thing was developed? It was originally developed to try to stimulate muscle in soldiers legs who were paralyzed in either WWI or WWII, can't remember form school. The ejaculation was a side effect. It was found that after time it degenerated nerves in the legs instead of stimulating muscle. It's no wonder these bulls that are collected in that way over a period of time become unsound.
And the conditions these bulls are housed in. Sometimes I'm sick at what my calves live in. According to the pics from REI, mine live in a mansion. I have never been to a stud where it wasn't wet, muddy, uneven, and small. All things that contribute to the unsoundness of a bull no matter his skeletal structure. Many have shade that is only over concrete. It is really hard for me to believe that aspca hasn't been all over some of these people. They may not be intentionally mistreated but they are certainly housed in conditions and cared for in ways that are not conducive to long life and good health of a mature bull. I am sure that there are bull studs that have better facilities than others. I've seen pictures, just never been there.
My point is, I don't think that you'd be so surprised at how unsound and how bad these bulls appear if you were more familiar with how they are handled and managed at MOST facilities. Maybe you have experiences with better facilities or different management. But it is not the norm. Or maybe you think that a bull should look like his show pictures after being housed in a small, wet, muddy, uneven, pen with concrete in 1/3 of it, being fed rough hay and a little feed. Some of these bulls would eat 100 lbs of grain a day. Maybe you think 20 should be enough to keep them fit. Mayeb as someone said they are treated better than some are treated at home. If that's the case, those bulls have poor homes and I feel sorry for them.
I would say, "it's just my opinion." But it's not an opinion, it's just my experience.