knabe
Well-known member
way to corral mr. smith is the organize the classes so that there is no overall champion, just category champions. make prizes bigger for bred, owned and shown. kinda like nba basketball, set the bar lower so people can win something. have fair board make rule cattle in a certain category are at home of exhibitor. how about a rule open champion has to be shown by owner. i guess owner could pay board at mr. smith, but again you could make rule that overall champion has to live at home. that way mr. smith could still win, he just can't have overall champion so that he is motivated to compete where he has competition like at naile, national shows etc. people just need some guts. does mr. smith's kids show the livestock, or are they other kids. change the rules to demphasize hair and that if mr. smith types don't do a wet class, they can't win the open.
how does a kid get blackballedd? i say forget it. get on the board that chooses the judges, if you can't because you are blackballed, get people together and come up with solutions. if your fair is small enough like ours, hire the hi pointer on the national college judging team from your state. try hiring someone different to judge. it sounds like this whole thing could use some competition. our fair is so small, none of this matters, but it would seem awful lonely to compete against yourself.
all that said, some of the comments don't square with what has been said in the past. someone mentioned before that some breeders take their best stock no matter the judge. you just can't please all the people all the time. if it isn't fun, change it. bottom line is that fairs are supposed to be fun.
at the college level in CA, there used to be best display awards. if we didn't win every year, we had our tail between our legs. our program had room for newbies and old hands alike. there was always complaining, dissing the other school's cattle, their clothes, who didn't wear wranglers, justins and how silly they looked. but we all worked as a team. perhaps that's what's missing at some of these shows. the more people volunteer to make the team, the less impact mr. smith should have.
at the other extreme, if everyone got a ribbon, it would be like little league not keeping score. the kids know whose winning and are not fooled by their parents.
i am sure there are better suggestions to rein in mr. smith
how does a kid get blackballedd? i say forget it. get on the board that chooses the judges, if you can't because you are blackballed, get people together and come up with solutions. if your fair is small enough like ours, hire the hi pointer on the national college judging team from your state. try hiring someone different to judge. it sounds like this whole thing could use some competition. our fair is so small, none of this matters, but it would seem awful lonely to compete against yourself.
all that said, some of the comments don't square with what has been said in the past. someone mentioned before that some breeders take their best stock no matter the judge. you just can't please all the people all the time. if it isn't fun, change it. bottom line is that fairs are supposed to be fun.
at the college level in CA, there used to be best display awards. if we didn't win every year, we had our tail between our legs. our program had room for newbies and old hands alike. there was always complaining, dissing the other school's cattle, their clothes, who didn't wear wranglers, justins and how silly they looked. but we all worked as a team. perhaps that's what's missing at some of these shows. the more people volunteer to make the team, the less impact mr. smith should have.
at the other extreme, if everyone got a ribbon, it would be like little league not keeping score. the kids know whose winning and are not fooled by their parents.
i am sure there are better suggestions to rein in mr. smith