[/quote]So your saying that we should raise terrible cows and have more dead cows and calfs than live just to maybe get one good one. Let alone if he cant keep up so your telling me that there using a clone and posting it as HW. well what if the clones sucks? Just because HW throughs good STEERS doesnt meen that they will have anything better than market.
[/quote]
Jallen, I didn't say you should do anything. What I did was give you the simple reason why he has been cloned so much. It's obvious just from the fact that so many Heatwaves exist, that he works for others much better than he does for you. Ever here of Lautner cloning Moody Blues or say.....We Got Him??? Although I am sure they have had a few good calves, there wasn't so much demand for the semen that they needed two of them. The reasons that clones are produced of any specific animal is purely economic. If that is a concept that is too difficult to grasp, look at it like this, the owners of the bulls in question make MILLIONS of dollars selling semen on them. A million dollar bills stacked on top of one another is about 35 stories high. Maybe that gives you a picture of why these bulls have been cloned. They don't care that Heatweave offspring won't work for the commercial cow man in the sand dunes, they DON'T CARE. It would be like Toyota caring that you got your Corolla stuck in the mud hole out on the back 40. The Corolla wasn't developed for the back 40. It's your fault you put it there.
But the main point of my post was to point out that there is no need to discuss what someone else should do, what's "best." We can run a cow calf unit per acre. The cows that work here commercially are not the best for the beloved sand dunes. Doesn't mean I should have the same kind of cows they do there. And I don't know enough about Chambero's environment, labor, facilities, goals, aspirations, or resources to form an opinion of what is best for him. He will get along just fine without me spouting off about what is best for him. So many of these posts serve absolutely no purpose, other than to bash someone else's ideas or program. Like yours, for instance.
But if I were to suggest that you do anything, first I would suggest that you ask your parents to put you in a school where they teach correct spelling of such easy words as "throw" and "mean." Not to mention the plural form of the word "calf." Then after you get Spelling and English down a little better you could move on to science where you would learn that when viewed over a large enough sample, indeed the result of breeding the clones would appear to be statistically very near exact.
In the mean time, when you post something, remember to try to give your opinion in such a way as not to appear to tell someone that what they do is stupid. It serves absolutely no good purpose other than to cause ill feelings and make you appear jealous of someone else's success. If you don't believe that just read the paragraph above, I didn't mean it, just wrote it to prove a point.
[/quote]
Jallen, I didn't say you should do anything. What I did was give you the simple reason why he has been cloned so much. It's obvious just from the fact that so many Heatwaves exist, that he works for others much better than he does for you. Ever here of Lautner cloning Moody Blues or say.....We Got Him??? Although I am sure they have had a few good calves, there wasn't so much demand for the semen that they needed two of them. The reasons that clones are produced of any specific animal is purely economic. If that is a concept that is too difficult to grasp, look at it like this, the owners of the bulls in question make MILLIONS of dollars selling semen on them. A million dollar bills stacked on top of one another is about 35 stories high. Maybe that gives you a picture of why these bulls have been cloned. They don't care that Heatweave offspring won't work for the commercial cow man in the sand dunes, they DON'T CARE. It would be like Toyota caring that you got your Corolla stuck in the mud hole out on the back 40. The Corolla wasn't developed for the back 40. It's your fault you put it there.
But the main point of my post was to point out that there is no need to discuss what someone else should do, what's "best." We can run a cow calf unit per acre. The cows that work here commercially are not the best for the beloved sand dunes. Doesn't mean I should have the same kind of cows they do there. And I don't know enough about Chambero's environment, labor, facilities, goals, aspirations, or resources to form an opinion of what is best for him. He will get along just fine without me spouting off about what is best for him. So many of these posts serve absolutely no purpose, other than to bash someone else's ideas or program. Like yours, for instance.
But if I were to suggest that you do anything, first I would suggest that you ask your parents to put you in a school where they teach correct spelling of such easy words as "throw" and "mean." Not to mention the plural form of the word "calf." Then after you get Spelling and English down a little better you could move on to science where you would learn that when viewed over a large enough sample, indeed the result of breeding the clones would appear to be statistically very near exact.
In the mean time, when you post something, remember to try to give your opinion in such a way as not to appear to tell someone that what they do is stupid. It serves absolutely no good purpose other than to cause ill feelings and make you appear jealous of someone else's success. If you don't believe that just read the paragraph above, I didn't mean it, just wrote it to prove a point.
