red
Well-known member
all I can say is OH IO!!!
Red
Red
shortdawg said:There's a pretty good case for all three but my hat is off to Colt McCoy. He's a really good kid and deserves it.
itk said:What are the chances that the the Heisman winner dosen't get first or second team all big 12. The sixth best QB in the Big 12 would be the best QB in most other conferences.
Austin said:Bradford wins, but Tebow gets the most 1st place votes? ???
Olson Family Shorthorns said:...but Oklahoma didn't have to play an SEC schedule (no offense, you Big 12 guys).
ghostrider said:Olson Family Shorthorns said:...but Oklahoma didn't have to play an SEC schedule (no offense, you Big 12 guys).
I'm not even an OU fan, but come on... OU played 6 teams that ended up in the BCS final top 25 (UT @3, TT @7, TCU @11, Cincinatti @12, OSU @13, and Missouri@21) - Florida played 3 ('Bama @4, Georgia @15 and Mississipi @25). The day's are gone when OU, Nebraska and UT were the only "big time" teams we might be able to muster up. Any of the Big 12's top 5 teams dropped into the SEC would stir things up pretty seriously. That's not to say that the top 2 or 3 teams from the SEC wouldn't do the same in the Big 12, but as a whole, there's just nothing to prove that the SEC could dominate the Big 12.
Big Tex, again, I'm not even an OU fan, but if UT deserves to win the South because they beat OU, then why doesn't Tech deserve it since they beat UT? I agree the whole thing stinks, but there really just isn't a right answer. OU (and Bradford) ended up on top for one reason - momentum. They've been very, very good these last few weeks, and they've been very lucky, too, not to have tripped over themselves in the process - can they keep it up through the NC? I guess we'll just have to wait and see...
rtnok said:TJ, I don't think OU is as slow as you think. But we will wait and see Jan. 8th. I admit the SEC is Strong but they haven't seen the offences of the big 12 this year. The only reason OU looks so slow is because the offence runs so smooth. Roni