Difference between stierwalt pro enhancer and stiewalt white powder touchup

[ctroidl]

They both have powder to enhance hair follicles.

 

[Mainevent]

From what I can tell using both. The paint is more powder and goes through the hair building on the bone. The Enhancer clings to the hair follicles and builds it. I love the enhancer used it on a bull I showed at Jr. Nationals and it worked wonders. Only complaint I have is that it needs time to dry if you plan on clipping the leg any after spraying it on as it can gum your clippers up in a hurry.

 

[bcosu]

not a fan of the pro enhancer. too gummy for me. sullivan's white touch up is better.

 

[sizzler14]

The enhancer can be summed us as "BONE IN A CAN". It isnt meant to be used as white touch up, thats going to be a lot of peoples problem. They dont know how to use it. It is made to fill in holes on the legs that you can see through either on the back or the front of the leg. You do have to let it dry, but it isnt made to be a white touch up. it is meant to fill holes. I am including a pic of a leg on my heifer kirk used it on the back side

 

[DSC]

Wow I like the fill the enhance gives. I have always used Sullivan's but have always been intrigued by Weavers. Might have to give it a try. How does the powder touch up work?