There were some things I took away from this that i agreed with and some I agree with Gargans terminology of BS! The thing I did agree on was going in and altering genes and then cloning them because of what he said it takes 50 years. I believe it takes like 3 generations to see a difference in a specfic trait your breeding for in cattle, where as in the pigs you can do it essentially in 1 year. The beef industry now has to keep watching out for the poultry industry because they are able to adapt and change rapidly, and be able to get their product to market faster in a smaller area. So I agree with the altering of genes and then cloning them and then promoting the bull and getting semen out fast. Its a great idea because you can cut down on 2 generations of experiementing that in the end just may not work and you have to start over. I just dont know about the white angus! I realize the worlds population percipition is Angus is what GOD had to eat, but they're not the end all be all. If they were, certified angus beef would be 100% purebred angus, not just black hided cattle with a certain ribeye. But why cant we make herefords that excel with heat and other facits because of their excellent marbling? Why cant we alter the charolais to be able to finish faster (13-14 months), why are they only wanting the angus?? I feel you could alter multiple breeds and improve them to the standards we need. I understand the white shorthair, but I think this article and scientist has a lot of tunnel vision when it comes to Angus. It could be this is the first they've tried and Angus cattle were available to their disposal. I mean when they started cloning they worked on Dolly the sheep and then went to cattle. I just feel this article was published pre-maturly. I wanted to see Graphs and Stats proving this and proven justification, none of which they provided. I think they could be on the right track with altering genes, just maybe not the way their stating it.