Did you breed any Grandmasters last year? If so how do they compare? I used Built Right and Dream Catcher on Angus last year and would definitely say the BR calves are deeper bodied, softer made and more moderate framed. My DC are hairier and a notch bigger boned. Of course my DC calves are bulls and 1 of them is pretty good. I have 3 BR daughters that I am really excited about and they are getting better every day. I will definitely use more BR in the future and am undecided on DC, I did breed 2 to him for next year and will wait and see. I know Werning's sell the heck out of the DC calves. I am anxious to see some Grandmaster's as I did not get any settled last year.husker1 said:I think that I can now give my opinion as well.
We had 4 or 5 DC's this year, so I have something to go by. DC was bred to some of our best cows. We have one nice heifer that is a natural calf out of a donor, but she's not in the top 10% of our heifers. As a sire group, certainly not toward the top. After analyzing his calves, I'd say that he maintains bone, they are good structured and have style, but I think he might give up some performance, thickness, and body depth. If we continue to use him, it will be selectively...probably to pretty things up only.
You always hear that certain Simmentals work great on "broody Angus cows." Well, in my opinion, a broody Angus cow is simply the "fix all" for any Simmental bull that doesn't throw enough guts. I'm being too opinionated today, but thinking of the Simmental bulls that work well on Angus cows...Macho, Meyer, etc...in most cases, these bulls don't throw enough guts when bred to purebred Simm cows...unless the cow can make up for the bull's shortcomings. To me, most Simmental bulls work excellent on Angus cows...just the perfect cross. We have one Simmental cow that carried Dream Catcher well, but she's a powerhouse...I think she'd carry Meyer and Macho as well...takes a special cow.
Anyway, DC probably wasn't all that I was hoping that he was gonna be on purebred cows. I will concur that he makes some phenomenal halfbloods.
Not to highjack the thread...Simmgal said:Okay, so hes not a SUPERBULL, but he's good for crossing. I think I got it! haha.. If he doesn't, what Simmi bulls add depth...and, dare I say it?..Clean fronts!
the truth said:Not to highjack the thread...Simmgal said:Okay, so hes not a SUPERBULL, but he's good for crossing. I think I got it! haha.. If he doesn't, what Simmi bulls add depth...and, dare I say it?..Clean fronts!
I'm gona just talk in livestock sense.. but typically to me... most of the time when we're discussing sires that add body depth, the next word will NOT be anything to pretty, ie; clean fronts, extended necks, or "pretty" fronted. It happens, maybe in only my eyes, that sires who add, or maintain body depth will coarsen up the offsping, add body girth, and almost always substance.
Now, when I think of a sire that will be promoted as a producer of pretty, extended, clean fronted offspring-- the first thing that comes to mind is shallow bodied, and harder looking.
I really think that this type of sire cannot exist naturally- according to the nature of livestock breeding and genetics. Now, I'm not up on my Simi background (other than a tad bulls I've seen in person) so I cannot be for certain.
Maybe somebody else can chime in...
I guess that maybe Dream On might have been the only thing that I've consistantely seem perhaps the most 'ideal' in. Maybe that's why 95% of the Simi's trace to him within 3 generations?
I've been around Rendition a little in my days, and his owner even more (for years). I'd say that I were making Simi's.. he'd be my go to bull for adding to the "whole picture."