OH Breeder said:
We regulate who can and can't adopt children yet provide no mandatory birth control. I am with you on that. Having children should require a license.
in CA, we almost passed a regulation you had to have a license to have a cat or dog, and extra fees for breeders with mandatory spay neuter if you didn't have breeder status.
it would be far cheaper to allow trap/kill plus trap/spay-neuter/release, but of course we can't do that because we have to argue about which one of those is better.
i have two feral feeders near me with over 50 cats each. it's a complete joke. also have a former animal control officer with too many dogs on premises that bark bark bark and are in too small a cage with little activity.
i wonder how many births/abortions would be reduced if one simply had a requirement that to get government funds, you had to be temporarily sterilized. of course the hitler analogy would emerge.
hmm, think of all the bailout recipients. then we would need immigrants. ugh.
the media didn't allow palin to be portrayed as intelligent, and palin/mccain (preferred order) blew it as well.
it should be pretty obvious the media is totally democratic with the most glaring example being chris matthews saying essentially the media should help obama, rather than perform their normal role.
it's amazing how little effort it takes to impose actionable bias.