SHAGGY
Well-known member
Anything that isn't solid black around here gets really hit hard, we can disagree all we want but at the end of the day its what the customer wants not what you think they should have. '
qbcattle said:the only way to solve this would be to have a market like the hog market where they pay you based carcass performance rather than on foot. But i dont see the beef industry going to that anytime soon.
blackcows said:qbcattle said:the only way to solve this would be to have a market like the hog market where they pay you based carcass performance rather than on foot. But i dont see the beef industry going to that anytime soon.
The beef industry has already gone that way, most fat cattle are sold on the grid.
qbcattle said:blackcows said:qbcattle said:the only way to solve this would be to have a market like the hog market where they pay you based carcass performance rather than on foot. But i dont see the beef industry going to that anytime soon.
The beef industry has already gone that way, most fat cattle are sold on the grid.
at the end but it has not worked its way down to the actual rancher at the sale barn.
qbcattle said:you will docked at the barn for non-uniformity, paints resemble to most as simmental crosses which r known for spending too many days on feed before slaughter, because of the risks due to inconsistency there are going to be discounts.
I really like this reply and I agree with 90% of it. I think where the problem comes in is the part about buying Angus influence and lowering the risk. I totally agree with this theory and believe it to be true, but the only way that you can assure that there is "strong" angus influence is to be in a program like CAB or Angus Source. Shorthorn have proven that they have as much tenderness and marbling as Angus but they are still getting discounted 20 cents on the dollar compared to any black crossbred calf. This is where the issue is. If you can verify that black equals high influence Angus, then the premiums should be higher, but cattle shouldnt be discounted for something other than black.HAFarm said:I will preface my comments by saying I am an Angus breeder.
You know what they say "Once you go black....."
I don't agree with the previous statement about IMF, you can't have too much...see Kobe beef. How much do you have to pay for a pound of that stuff? In my mind and most consumers minds no marbling equals shoe leather. Why are steaks the most valuable cuts? They are the most marbled. If a consumer has to be concerned with how to cook a steak other than throw it on the grill they will not continue to buy our product. Most people don't have the knowledge or ability to cook unmarbled beef and make it taste good and be tender.
We all basically get paid for IMF if we sell feeders or replacements. By buying a strong Angus influenced animal a buyer is lowering their risk of getting an animal that is not well marbled. Not eliminating just lowering.
I have stated this before on this site, the American Angus Association has done a far superior job of getting consumers to know the value of Angus over the other breeds. "You can't fit an elephant in a box."
Bingo!!! I saw a 575-lb black, HORNED, Limousin calf that was STILL A BULL bring more money per pound AS A SINGLE, than 4 good,525-lb (average wt) ,sure-enough Red Angus steer calves that were weaned, vaccinated, and pre-conditioned. This happenned at a Northwest Arkansas sale barn, about 45 miles or so, from Will. Here, it's only about color, period. Marbling????These guys are still using Homozygous-Black-Continental sires. NOT Balncers, SimAngus, or Limiflex, neither. The Angus deal is just now BARELY taking ahold of things around here, through guys buying their replacements out of Missouri, instead of keeping back their heifers.JTM said:I really like this reply and I agree with 90% of it. I think where the problem comes in is the part about buying Angus influence and lowering the risk. I totally agree with this theory and believe it to be true, but the only way that you can assure that there is "strong" angus influence is to be in a program like CAB or Angus Source. Shorthorn have proven that they have as much tenderness and marbling as Angus but they are still getting discounted 20 cents on the dollar compared to any black crossbred calf. This is where the issue is. If you can verify that black equals high influence Angus, then the premiums should be higher, but cattle shouldnt be discounted for something other than black.HAFarm said:I will preface my comments by saying I am an Angus breeder.
You know what they say "Once you go black....."
I don't agree with the previous statement about IMF, you can't have too much...see Kobe beef. How much do you have to pay for a pound of that stuff? In my mind and most consumers minds no marbling equals shoe leather. Why are steaks the most valuable cuts? They are the most marbled. If a consumer has to be concerned with how to cook a steak other than throw it on the grill they will not continue to buy our product. Most people don't have the knowledge or ability to cook unmarbled beef and make it taste good and be tender.
We all basically get paid for IMF if we sell feeders or replacements. By buying a strong Angus influenced animal a buyer is lowering their risk of getting an animal that is not well marbled. Not eliminating just lowering.
I have stated this before on this site, the American Angus Association has done a far superior job of getting consumers to know the value of Angus over the other breeds. "You can't fit an elephant in a box."
Even with Jac's Ranch, James Roberts (300 head of Emulous-bred cattle), Dixie Cattle company, and many small breeders here, change is sloooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooow.garybob said:Bingo!!! I saw a 575-lb black, HORNED, Limousin calf that was STILL A BULL bring more money per pound AS A SINGLE, than 4 good,525-lb (average wt) ,sure-enough Red Angus steer calves that were weaned, vaccinated, and pre-conditioned. This happenned at a Northwest Arkansas sale barn, about 45 miles or so, from Will. Here, it's only about color, period. Marbling????These guys are still using Homozygous-Black-Continental sires. NOT Balncers, SimAngus, or Limiflex, neither. The Angus deal is just now BARELY taking ahold of things around here, through guys buying their replacements out of Missouri, instead of keeping back their heifers.JTM said:I really like this reply and I agree with 90% of it. I think where the problem comes in is the part about buying Angus influence and lowering the risk. I totally agree with this theory and believe it to be true, but the only way that you can assure that there is "strong" angus influence is to be in a program like CAB or Angus Source. Shorthorn have proven that they have as much tenderness and marbling as Angus but they are still getting discounted 20 cents on the dollar compared to any black crossbred calf. This is where the issue is. If you can verify that black equals high influence Angus, then the premiums should be higher, but cattle shouldnt be discounted for something other than black.HAFarm said:I will preface my comments by saying I am an Angus breeder.
You know what they say "Once you go black....."
I don't agree with the previous statement about IMF, you can't have too much...see Kobe beef. How much do you have to pay for a pound of that stuff? In my mind and most consumers minds no marbling equals shoe leather. Why are steaks the most valuable cuts? They are the most marbled. If a consumer has to be concerned with how to cook a steak other than throw it on the grill they will not continue to buy our product. Most people don't have the knowledge or ability to cook unmarbled beef and make it taste good and be tender.
We all basically get paid for IMF if we sell feeders or replacements. By buying a strong Angus influenced animal a buyer is lowering their risk of getting an animal that is not well marbled. Not eliminating just lowering.
I have stated this before on this site, the American Angus Association has done a far superior job of getting consumers to know the value of Angus over the other breeds. "You can't fit an elephant in a box."
Scary, but, true.
GB