My hats off to Jirl Buck - he stepped up to the plate and did the right thing (IMHO). If you have been here for any length of time you know I have been critical of his approach in the past.
Just got my spring Buck Sale catalog - all his heifers are or will be tested and (these are direct quotes from the catalog)
"As of fall 2006, we are castrating all PHA carrier bulls to assure our customers that we will not sell carrier bulls. I think we can manage this by simply cutting the PHA carrier bulls and using PHA free sires in the future. I feel that carrier females will be fine with selective breeding"
Now I do find calling PHA a "birth defect" (which is technically true) a little bizarre as I would call it a death defect but hey I not going to argue about semantics when he stepped up to the plate, and after all it is a sale catalog ;D
I posted this on SS but ya never know if it will disappear - after all there is no reason to talk about PHA any more, is there, because it is such a minor issue? (please note lime green denotes both sarcasm and jealousy) try to explain how minor it is to a kid whose first heifer just died with a PHA calf.
and along the same lines our old friend Genetics Law Dawg posted the following thought provoking information - I invited GLD to stop by and expound nd expand, maybe MLK32 could too
..tidbits from GLD in blue
Just an interesting little tidbit on the subject of the omission of the carrier status.
I will leave this for interpretation come as it may but....
"K.S.A. 50-639(h) permits disclaimer of warranties for livestock unless the seller 'knowingly sells livesstock which is diseased.'"
Granted it says "diseased" and not "possessing genetic defects", but......
everybody have a great night - DL (cow)
oh boy I feel my karma slipping.....there it goes.....
Just got my spring Buck Sale catalog - all his heifers are or will be tested and (these are direct quotes from the catalog)
"As of fall 2006, we are castrating all PHA carrier bulls to assure our customers that we will not sell carrier bulls. I think we can manage this by simply cutting the PHA carrier bulls and using PHA free sires in the future. I feel that carrier females will be fine with selective breeding"
Now I do find calling PHA a "birth defect" (which is technically true) a little bizarre as I would call it a death defect but hey I not going to argue about semantics when he stepped up to the plate, and after all it is a sale catalog ;D
I posted this on SS but ya never know if it will disappear - after all there is no reason to talk about PHA any more, is there, because it is such a minor issue? (please note lime green denotes both sarcasm and jealousy) try to explain how minor it is to a kid whose first heifer just died with a PHA calf.
and along the same lines our old friend Genetics Law Dawg posted the following thought provoking information - I invited GLD to stop by and expound nd expand, maybe MLK32 could too
..tidbits from GLD in blue
Just an interesting little tidbit on the subject of the omission of the carrier status.
I will leave this for interpretation come as it may but....
"K.S.A. 50-639(h) permits disclaimer of warranties for livestock unless the seller 'knowingly sells livesstock which is diseased.'"
Granted it says "diseased" and not "possessing genetic defects", but......
everybody have a great night - DL (cow)
oh boy I feel my karma slipping.....there it goes.....