Hedge Fund Manager's letter to shareholders

Steer Planet - Cattle, Steer & Livestock Forum

Help Support Steer Planet:

Dusty

Well-known member
Joined
Feb 13, 2008
Messages
1,097
Reaction score
0
Andrew Lahde was a California-based hedge fund manager who hard earned a hefty return in 2007 upwards of 800% by speculating on increases of U.S. subprime mortgage defaults.

In September 2008, Lahde closed his fund, telling investors that credit problems, the basis of his profits, were likely to continue, but that possibility of defaults by counterparties was too high.

This is his goodbye letter to shareholders.  Although I don't agree with everything he says, mainly having George Soros involved in anything with creating a new government, he pretty much says it like it is.

Good-bye letter in full

Today I write not to gloat. Given the pain that nearly everyone is experiencing, that would be entirely inappropriate. Nor am I writing to make further predictions, as most of my forecasts in previous letters have unfolded or are in the process of unfolding. Instead, I am writing to say goodbye.

Recently, on the front page of Section C of the Wall Street Journal, a hedge fund manager who was also closing up shop (a $300 million fund), was quoted as saying, "What I have learned about the hedge fund business is that I hate it." I could not agree more with that statement. I was in this game for the money. The low hanging fruit, i.e. idiots whose parents paid for prep school, Yale, and then the Harvard MBA, was there for the taking. These people who were (often) truly not worthy of the education they received (or supposedly received) rose to the top of companies such as AIG, Bear Stearns and Lehman Brothers and all levels of our government. All of this behavior supporting the Aristocracy, only ended up making it easier for me to find people stupid enough to take the other side of my trades. God bless America.

There are far too many people for me to sincerely thank for my success. However, I do not want to sound like a Hollywood actor accepting an award. The money was reward enough. Furthermore, the endless list those deserving thanks know who they are.

I will no longer manage money for other people or institutions. I have enough of my own wealth to manage. Some people, who think they have arrived at a reasonable estimate of my net worth, might be surprised that I would call it quits with such a small war chest. That is fine; I am content with my rewards. Moreover, I will let others try to amass nine, ten or eleven figure net worths. Meanwhile, their lives suck. Appointments back to back, booked solid for the next three months, they look forward to their two week vacation in January during which they will likely be glued to their Blackberries or other such devices. What is the point? They will all be forgotten in fifty years anyway. Steve Balmer, Steven Cohen, and Larry Ellison will all be forgotten. I do not understand the legacy thing. Nearly everyone will be forgotten. Give up on leaving your mark. Throw the Blackberry away and enjoy life. So this is it. With all due respect, I am dropping out. Please do not expect any type of reply to emails or voicemails within normal time frames or at all. Andy Springer and his company will be handling the dissolution of the fund. And don't worry about my employees, they were always employed by Mr. Springer's company and only one (who has been well-rewarded) will lose his job.

I have no interest in any deals in which anyone would like me to participate. I truly do not have a strong opinion about any market right now, other than to say that things will continue to get worse for some time, probably years. I am content sitting on the sidelines and waiting. After all, sitting and waiting is how we made money from the subprime debacle. I now have time to repair my health, which was destroyed by the stress I layered onto myself over the past two years, as well as my entire life -- where I had to compete for spaces in universities and graduate schools, jobs and assets under management -- with those who had all the advantages (rich parents) that I did not. May meritocracy be part of a new form of government, which needs to be established.

On the issue of the U.S. Government, I would like to make a modest proposal. First, I point out the obvious flaws, whereby legislation was repeatedly brought forth to Congress over the past eight years, which would have reigned in the predatory lending practices of now mostly defunct institutions. These institutions regularly filled the coffers of both parties in return for voting down all of this legislation designed to protect the common citizen. This is an outrage, yet no one seems to know or care about it. Since Thomas Jefferson and Adam Smith passed, I would argue that there has been a dearth of worthy philosophers in this country, at least ones focused on improving government. Capitalism worked for two hundred years, but times change, and systems become corrupt. George Soros, a man of staggering wealth, has stated that he would like to be remembered as a philosopher. My suggestion is that this great man start and sponsor a forum for great minds to come together to create a new system of government that truly represents the common man's interest, while at the same time creating rewards great enough to attract the best and brightest minds to serve in government roles without having to rely on corruption to further their interests or lifestyles. This forum could be similar to the one used to create the operating system, Linux, which competes with Microsoft's near monopoly. I believe there is an answer, but for now the system is clearly broken.

Lastly, while I still have an audience, I would like to bring attention to an alternative food and energy source. You won't see it included in BP's, "Feel good. We are working on sustainable solutions," television commercials, nor is it mentioned in ADM's similar commercials. But hemp has been used for at least 5,000 years for cloth and food, as well as just about everything that is produced from petroleum products. Hemp is not marijuana and vice versa. Hemp is the male plant and it grows like a weed, hence the slang term. The original American flag was made of hemp fiber and our Constitution was printed on paper made of hemp. It was used as recently as World War II by the U.S. Government, and then promptly made illegal after the war was won. At a time when rhetoric is flying about becoming more self-sufficient in terms of energy, why is it illegal to grow this plant in this country? Ah, the female. The evil female plant -- marijuana. It gets you high, it makes you laugh, it does not produce a hangover. Unlike alcohol, it does not result in bar fights or wife beating. So, why is this innocuous plant illegal? Is it a gateway drug? No, that would be alcohol, which is so heavily advertised in this country. My only conclusion as to why it is illegal, is that Corporate America, which owns Congress, would rather sell you Paxil, Zoloft, Xanax and other additive drugs, than allow you to grow a plant in your home without some of the profits going into their coffers. This policy is ludicrous. It has surely contributed to our dependency on foreign energy sources. Our policies have other countries literally laughing at our stupidity, most notably Canada, as well as several European nations (both Eastern and Western). You would not know this by paying attention to U.S. media sources though, as they tend not to elaborate on who is laughing at the United States this week. Please people, let's stop the rhetoric and start thinking about how we can truly become self-sufficient. With that I say good-bye and good luck.

All the best, - Andrew Lahde
 
Dusty said:
My only conclusion as to why it is illegal, is that Corporate America, which owns Congress, would rather sell you Paxil, Zoloft, Xanax and other additive drugs, than allow you to grow a plant in your home without some of the profits going into their coffers.

look up the history of marijuana in the US for racist prohibition.

the other reason you can't grow stuff like this, is because it's difficult to tax.

the government is against you being addicted to something they can't get revenue from.

the same policy is happening with almost everything, the most recent, water.  the government doesn't want ANYONE owning their own water.  they are grabbing water rights with speed no one is noticing.  probably the biggest grabber is harry reid from nevada.  but no one cares because they are addicted to government.

addiction to government and alchohol is WORSE than "addiction" to pot.

the absence of morality is also a gateway drug, again, probably worse than pot.

i would disagree with him regarding jefferson.  the man paid money twice to distribute untruths about john adams and even sought to keep treaty agreements secret so he could get elected.  he even apologized for it in a letter in his old age.

yes, adams is my favorite founding father.  he definately deserves a monument up there with washington, lincoln and definately the scoundrel jefforson.

here's more

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/11/10/us/10bake.html?_r=2&oref=slogin&oref=slogin

The regulatory focus on school nutrition has been gaining ground nationwide in recent years, amid concerns over childhood obesity and a lack of access to healthful food. Sixteen states have set standards for so-called competitive foods that compete with meals, like à la carte cookies, cinnamon buns and soft drinks. And, yes, this even affects bake sales.

In Chula Vista, Calif., near San Diego, sales plummeted at Hilltop High School’s multicultural food fair, an annual fund-raising event for the foreign language and global studies departments that has traditionally featured bratwurst, breadsticks with marinara sauce, apple pie and root beer floats. “This year was really hard,” said Jade Wagner, a senior, referring to the half-bratwursts and nondairy diet root beers.

If bake sales are out, “healthy” fund-raisers, like carwashes and balloon-o-grams, are in. In Oakland, Calif., new traditions are replacing old ones: a “Healthy Halloween” vegetable platter for kindergartners at Montclair Elementary; power bars and apple slices at the after-school homework club at Crocker Highlands Elementary; a Caesar salad-making class, a weekly organic produce stand and “nutrition breaks” replacing snack breaks at Peralta Elementary.

In Berkeley, birthplace of California cuisine, food served at school is free of bovine growth hormones, irradiation, hydrogenated oils and known genetic modification.

Birthday celebrations are not immune from nutrition watchdogs: around the country, there is growing pressure to forgo cupcakes in favor of nonfood treats.

“I don’t think all celebrations need to be around food,” said Ann Cooper, the director of nutrition services for the Berkeley school district. “We need to get past the mentality of food used for punishment or praise.”


amazing we treat food the same way we treat marijuana.  thanks for the diversity america.
 
"healthy Halloween" is about the dumbest idea I ever heard.


While the majority of this nations population is obese (probably myself included) the need to regulate food items is ridiculous. 

Accountability/responsibility is a thing of the past.  Its still your hand going to your mouth.

Ron Paul has some interesting ideas about pot.

 
Now you gave me one I can sink my teeth into!!!

Healthy Halloween, my #$@%!

If I can make it past 4H mom and get to the Senate, the first thing I would change is EXACTLY WHAT can be charged to the food stamp credit card.  Here in Colorado, welfare folks get a beautiful "Colorado Access" card (which looks like a Visa card as to remove the stigma associated with FOOD STAMPS.)

You may not charge any paper, hygiene or cleaning products, but most other food is fair game......like twinkies, ding dongs, deli foods, marshmallows, did I say deli foods, cakes, cookies, did I say twinkies, bacon, bratwurst, hot dogs, frozen convenience foods, etc.etc.

What is wrong with limiting the fat content % and the type of foods provided with our tax dollars?  How about only allowing foods with less than  15 % fat and allow basic ingredients.......heaven forbid someone learn how to prepare a meal from scratch.    You may have to get off the couch and spend some time slaving for 20 minutes over a stove!!

Whew....I have been waiting to say this for a long, long time.  Thanks I feel better now. (lol)
 
cowz said:
What is wrong with limiting the fat content % and the type of foods provided with our tax dollars? 

cowz, that is the conundrum.  when government has universal health care, they may start imposing that on everyone.

that's why i inferred twinkies are worse than jane.

 
Back
Top