Don't mean to stir the pot, and I certainly can understand that everyone has their favorites in these big time deals, but I think the top 5 were pretty easy to follow and I sure agreed with how Douglas picked em. The Faber calf was very complete. Not the hairiest or prettiest one out there. but from a width, soundness, completeness standpoint he was my clear favorite as well. Prettier and stouter than the Freeman steer, smother shouldered with more flank than the Sullivan steer, more shapely than the Maurer steer, better handle than the Ferguson steer. I think each of the steers in the top 5 had an advantage in one trait, but for me the Faber calf was the most complete. I found him very easy to follow in the steers and i think he ended up with the same kind of decision in the market heifer show.
As far as the halter statements go, I think we find ourselves making these statements without thinking about the big picture. Sure, the same families tend to stay on top, but there are reasons for it. More money, better cattle, work harder, better presented, better showman, etc. May be any and all of these factors. It sure sounds like sour grapes when people make these statements. If not, state the reasons why you think another animal was better. I hear or read that this calf or that calf should have one and it was "political" If you disagree with the judge on his placings, and want to vent about it, I am ok with it, but give me some supporting statements. I am ranting now, and of course this is JMHO.
Chap