Correct. Not a new problem. 48 years in a row at the Iowa State Fair. A discussion issue every year that I can remember.
I do hate to see such a general condemnation of higher performing cattle, though. There are cattle that are not shown in the correct class. I won't argue that a bit. There are, however, cattle that genuinely grow faster than others. If you've got an animal with a yearling EPD of over +100, wouldn't you expect that animal to be significantly heavier than one with a yearling EPD of +10? Throw in the 365 day a year pampering of many show cattle, all the feed additives, 24 hour a day hair care, plus who knows what else and it is no surprise to me that there is a wide disparity in a show calf line up. Some people just do a better job than others. I certainly hope we haven't reached the point where every time someone has a bigger one than we do we blindly convict them of cheating. I've been in classes where I had the biggest one and I've been in classes where I had the smallest one. Sometimes by far. I had a bull calf sired by Jam's Uh-Huh that was clearly the largest in his class every time he was shown. As a calf and as an early spring yearling. He was born at my place. If he was off on his birth date, it would be news to me. I would still recommend Uh-Huh as a true sire of performance if you want it. As far as the smaller ones I've had in recent classes, well we did the best we could do. I sold 5 spring steer calves to a neighbor this fall for him to feed out. They averaged 720 pounds. 4 were sired by Big Jake and 1 was sired by my Kinnaber Leader 9th son. Let's just say the Leader 9th grandson significantly lowered the average. GENETICS! Please don't condemn someone's show calf just because it's bigger than yours. It happens, I know. Just look around, pay attention, and you can pick out the people you trust. Those are the ones to tie in to. Show winners or not.