idalee said:
Interesting how things change! Just for fun, I went back to March 2014 and read the comments from XBAR on the first Vanguard calves - "these Vanguard calves are in a completely different league. More substance, more eye appeal, extremely vigorous at birth . . . a big shout out to JIT for breeding such a quality bull. He's looser structured, soggy bull w/ a huge hip and that's exactly what the commercial type shorthorn needs. . ." What happened?
No denying there were some exceptional calves.. I've never once denied the quality of the calves, not once...well the ones you could get out that is. I pulled 6 of the first 16 calves which he is absolutely aware of and then about every other one thereafter that season. There was only 2 bull calves that first season I didn't pull. That number more than doubled the following season. I assure you I have the wherewithal to have went back and deleted these posts if this was some type of conspiracy. Again, I had spent what I thought was a lot of money at the time and was very excited. I continued to make excuses for the bull- change of environment, putting him with 3-4 yr olds, didn't shave him when he got here, etc. I took all the responsibility for the first year's issues and, because of the breeder's continued claims of never having any issues like these, I wrote it off as my inexperience with these genetics. If only I would have known the birthweights and calving ease issues I was dealing with weren't the exception but rather the norm.
The final straw wasn't until I bred him to those brangus cows I mentioned. After accepting that I couldn't sussessfully breed him to Sh cows without having to be there all the time, I put him in with a group of mature fall calving cows. I keep records on all my cows. Calves were coming out of cows that had averaged 78-83lb calves over 5 years were now coming at 105, 112, etc. same shit I experienced with the SHs. When 7yr old cows are laying down dying because of dystocia, you then realize there's a bigger issue at hand- The "95lb" sire that was born "a little early-" Considering the avg bw I had out of bull calves was over 95lbs 1600 miles South of there,, one can only speculate as to just how "late" he was. I even sent him a picture of one that was 143lbs that I pulled with a a come a long in a creek bottom. Never once will you hear him admit this. Never once was there any response other than stating that these weren't typical results. Now 5 years later, we know this isn't true. I've talked to other breeders using these same genetics. There's a CLEAR CONSENSUS by all except the one breeder.
CAB said:
We've all had cattle that didn't perform like we had wished or planned on.
Absolutely.. I've bought cattle from all over the country- some terrible, some great. I agree that's part of it-- I'm not looking for any type of financial recourse and damn sure don't want another bull from there-- my only continued frustrations stems from the breeder continuing to blow sunshine up people's ass as far as how these cattle are raised, and what their intrinsic strengths and weaknesses are. That's it..