r.n.reed
Well-known member
- Joined
- Apr 29, 2008
- Messages
- 611
A.J.,One of the posters on the Keeney's corner site referenced by the Librarian mentions an experience with Simmental influenced cattle in the 70's.He also mentioned that all the cattle that had bumps on the pelvis also had high tailheads.It could be a valuable study to see if there was any correlation between the 2.
A.J. I know you are smarter than to use bulls just because they are 80lbs and you probably should of added that they needed to come from a herd that consistently produced those weights as opposed to the other extreme of 3 outliers from 3 different programs with much higher avg. birthweights.
Xbar,I greatly appreciate the many points you made in your post.I know you were using the birth to weaning spread to make a point but I would caution that we need to look at the big picture.In the 80's and the Marc data from that era will support this, we had cattle that could calve effortlessly and wean 700 pound calves that easily graded choice the problem was as the old timers use to say you had to tie the cow to the corn crib so she would rebreed in a timely manner.
A purebred breeder today needs to realize that they are supplying a component to the commercial industry .They need to reliably provide the traits their breed is strong in with the least amount of problems and even more so in the Shorthorn breed where our greatest potential is influencing the cow herd meaning long term instead of just being able to walk across the scales at 16 mo.An amazing birth to weaning spread could be just that, amazing or it could mean a financial disaster.Looking at the big picture is the most important trait a purebred breeder can have.
A.J. I know you are smarter than to use bulls just because they are 80lbs and you probably should of added that they needed to come from a herd that consistently produced those weights as opposed to the other extreme of 3 outliers from 3 different programs with much higher avg. birthweights.
Xbar,I greatly appreciate the many points you made in your post.I know you were using the birth to weaning spread to make a point but I would caution that we need to look at the big picture.In the 80's and the Marc data from that era will support this, we had cattle that could calve effortlessly and wean 700 pound calves that easily graded choice the problem was as the old timers use to say you had to tie the cow to the corn crib so she would rebreed in a timely manner.
A purebred breeder today needs to realize that they are supplying a component to the commercial industry .They need to reliably provide the traits their breed is strong in with the least amount of problems and even more so in the Shorthorn breed where our greatest potential is influencing the cow herd meaning long term instead of just being able to walk across the scales at 16 mo.An amazing birth to weaning spread could be just that, amazing or it could mean a financial disaster.Looking at the big picture is the most important trait a purebred breeder can have.