From the applied genetics point of view, the F94L might be useful. What if any of your cows are carriers of E226? If a resulting calf were to be homozygous E226, would that not be risky? Judging from the Canadian testing of Shorthorns, E226 bull carriers now are at near 70 head.
Some people ignore the myostatin issue, but we had a very large calf born a year ago, and that was reason enough to be sure that our herd bull is myostatin free, in case E226 is elsewhere in our cow herd. Sometimes lightning strikes twice. The giant calf at birth was from some POPULAR bloodlines, so I suspect double muscling is a potential problem down the road. Like the TH defective calf that we had born back in 2005, the ginormous 2018 calf was something I do not want to happen again to our customers or here.
In 2019 every birth here at the Homeplace was unassisted, including a few first calf heifers. Cowboys like for their cows to give birth on their own. Trouble free works for me.
In a university herd I saw a double muscled Angus calf decades ago, born without assistance. Homozygous carriers are not desirable.