RyanChandler
Well-known member
knabe said:if you bar all carriers, you dead end the rest of their genetics.
Only of those particular individuals. It's not like every member of the line is a carrier.
knabe said:if you bar all carriers, you dead end the rest of their genetics.
In that case your odds are 50/50.beebe said:Forgive me if this is a dumb question but I don't know the answer. If I find wonder bull and he is a carrier of any one of the known defects and I breed him to a cow that is clean what are the odds of producing a calf that is not a carrier?
beebe said:Forgive me if this is a dumb question but I don't know the answer. If I find wonder bull and he is a carrier of any one of the known defects and I breed him to a cow that is clean what are the odds of producing a calf that is not a carrier?
beebe said:This is the first time that I have asked this question and now that I have the answer I won't have to ask this question again. I might have to ask another one in the future.
Probably what works for me won't be the best for everyone. For me answers to my questions as I think of them is the best way I know of to learn. For example the next question is if a carrier female is bred to a non carrier bull and the resulting calf is a non carrier then there should be no problem from then on right? Or does the recessive gene reserve the right to show up in the future?knabe said:beebe said:This is the first time that I have asked this question and now that I have the answer I won't have to ask this question again. I might have to ask another one in the future.
I'm not asking you to not ask the question again. i'm asking what is effective to communicate to people who are just starting out what a recessive defect is and what it means to have a carrier and breed one to a potential carrier and if they are prepared for the consequences.
rarely do people get feedback on what is effective.
BroncoFan said:Yes they are and I would guess that a lot of clubby cattle operations has at least one cow that goes back to these bulls but are there operations that are still AI-in heavily to either of these bulls? Im just wondering.sue said:Double Stuff and Double Vision are PHAC ?BroncoFan said:I think the reason that DS really hasn't reared its ugly head is because there aren't many PHAC (I can't think of any besides Irish Whiskey that are really used at all.)bulls that are heavily used right now. Ones that would make more PHA carrier cows.
OH Breeder said:PHA and DS reside in the same marker or DNA strand. That is why it tends to be more severe mutation.
aj said:Does anyone have any data on steers winning big that were ds carriers? I think the reason there are no clean ds Shorthorn sires out there is because if they aren't carriers.......they don't have the look to be bulls.......kinda like the th free cattle won't win the steer shows. Looks almost like to me the ds defect is simply another tool in the steer jockeys arsenal. They will shoot for the ultimate th carrier,pha carrier, and now also ds carrier. I am afraid the ds defect has put a fork in the Shorthorn breed in alot of ways. maybe 100 years not so much if clean lines are developed it the breed. But there are just to many choices out their in the beef industry......why mess with a breed will all these defects? Its just another head ache. When you can go to the Angus, Red Angus, and other breeds that ban defects.
aj said:Doc.......let me try this again. Read my lips. The defects are banned in the Angus breeds. They are not eligible for registration. They are not a hobbie breed. They aren't a breed to play cowboy and cowgirl in during weekends ..............for the most part. I wish you good luck in your endeavers.
aj said:Doc.......let me try this again. Read my lips. The defects are banned in the Angus breeds. They are not eligible for registration. They are not a hobbie breed. They aren't a breed to play cowboy and cowgirl in during weekends ..............for the most part. I wish you good luck in your endeavers.