Opinions on this bull

[inthebarnagain]

evaluators, intelligence.  Actually you would fit right in with some of this group, not everyone uses spell check either.  Personally I don't think you have the right attitude to be in this group, we usually don't take very well to people who have a chip on their shoulder.  If you will read carefully you will see that no one said you photo-shopped the leg, they said they didn't like the way the bull stood on his own, not anything you did or didn't do. 

Lisa Hall

"we?"  wahahahahahahahahahahahahahah.

those who seek to be insulted will be insulted.

i challenge everyone to evaluate their lives and see if they have ever called anyone a name ever.  it's pretty clear that by saying someone is a hypocritical idiot, you are falling prey to your own circular logic.  this attitude is why people who excel in their fields don't post because they are held to a higher and higher standard than those throwing stones.  what does it matter if someone called someone a name on a discussion site or in the field or under their breath, it's all the same.  grow some skin.  maybe some females are still 10.  he called me a name, wahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha.   can "we" all get together and develope a 50.000000001% majority and ride that person out of town please. wahahahahahahahahahahahahaahahahahaha.   where's my mommy, i mean daddy.  wahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaahahahahahahahahahaahahahahahaahah

can wahahahahahahaha already wahahahahahahaha feel wahahahahahahaha the wahahahahahahaha response wahahahahahahaha.

FAIL
[/quote]

Sorry Knabe, I shouldn't have said "we", I guess I should have said "some people".  And the term I used was hypercritical, not hypocritical, meaning to judge to intensely, excessively criticize.

SORRY TO OFFEND ANYONE

 

[Show Dad]

This has been the most informing and entertaining topics we have had in awhile. Knabe you just crack me up.

Mark that is the most concise and best animal photography info I've read. I can see why you are in such demand. I would have loved to watch you take that picture. If I ever have something that great I will certainly give you a call. Keep posting we need your help (Most will have a hard time admitting they need help. Though some need psychiatric not photographic help! )
<alien>

 

[CAB]

  I also would like to thank you Mark for chiming in and say that I admire your talents. Most PPL know that you are one of the best when it comes to getting "the" shot. Please pipe in when you can stand it. Brent

 

[Throttle]

Sorry Knabe, I shouldn't have said "we", I guess I should have said "some people".  And the term I used was hypercritical, not hypocritical, meaning to judge to intensely, excessively criticize.

SORRY TO OFFEND ANYONE
[/quote]

Here's a great example of what happens when you throw the shtuff into the fan. Hate to be hypercritical, but I think you meant too, which has an entirely different meaning...I was gonna stay way away from this one, but I couldn't resist  (lol) It's all in good fun. Please don't call the spelling and grammar police on me cuz I never check it

 

[justintime]

I would also like to thank Mark for coming onto SP and informing us. The fact that he has come on here and defended his reputation speaks volumes to me.

I have always thought Mark is one of the better photographers in the business, and personally, I would believe his photos to be accurate depictions of an  animal, far sooner than several others who attach their name to a photo. To me, Mark has a natural way to bring the best of an animal out in the photo... and that does not mean he is a master of photoshopping. He simply understand the animals and understands his art so that he can combine these to bring the best of the animal  onto the screen or printed media.

In this case, it seems that the concern is the differences between picture 1 and 2 ( if I followed the thread correctly). Is this any different than having two different fitters dress the same animal at two different shows? I have seen animals change before my eyes when different fitters have prepared certain animals. Bringing out the best of our animals is what much of the discussion on SP is all about. To me, this seems to be a case of being guilty until proven innocent. I thought it was supposed to work the other way around.

 

[inthebarnagain]

Sorry Knabe, I shouldn't have said "we", I guess I should have said "some people".  And the term I used was hypercritical, not hypocritical, meaning to judge to intensely, excessively criticize.

SORRY TO OFFEND ANYONE

Here's a great example of what happens when you throw the shtuff into the fan. Hate to be hypercritical, but I think you meant too, which has an entirely different meaning...I was gonna stay way away from this one, but I couldn't resist  (lol) It's all in good fun. Please don't call the spelling and grammar police on me cuz I never check it
[/quote]

No joke, it is a shame spell check doesn't have grammar check TOO!   Although I doubt that one would get caught by grammar check

 

[knabe]

i changed the spelling on purpose.  i am very careful about spelling and meaning, some punctuation and never capitals.

and for the record, i have only been offended on this website for about 10 seconds and then i got over it.

peace out.