MajorsLucilleBall said:
So, one bull I am looking into is Northline Fat Tony. Thoughts? I really need to clean up her front end. Please keep in mind she is a show heifer for breeding beef, and her daughter will be also.
**Is there any way to "spin" the semen to assure it will be a heifer?**
From her photos, cleaning up her front end might be as big of issue as you think. She might be heavy shouldered, but not sloppy in the brisket/throat area.
I have used Fat Tony, and know of several others as well. He seems to be inconsistent even when bred to very similar type and bloodline females. They come small, and do grow but again, might hit, might miss.
From experience Hamley is calving ease, but he will down size a great deal. The calves are stylish and easy fleshing so might be one to consider. Please also remember, while you are aiming for a show heifer, that show heifer will hopefully be an addition to your herd, so make sure she is functional and has some maternal numbers behind her. A beautiful show heifer that doesn't milk is of no use, as is a show heifer that does not get bred.
CAB - you are correct, Genex does have a nice line up of red angus bulls. One bull is Conquest, but I am not sure he would sire "showy" calves, although I would take performance and function over flashy any day!!
As with any trait, too much of a good thing is not a good thing. No breeder or cattleman has ever been successful by selecting for one single trait, be it REA, bw, YW, or marbling.
There has been research on AI'ing females either "early" or "late" to manipulate calf sex. I am sure you can google it, as I can never keep it straight as to AI early for females or males (I think females).
For those that are not experienced in the "HC" theory; HC stand for head circumference. They measure every calf born and correlate that with calving ease. They have found that head circumference influences difficulty in birth. (Which I think most of us would understand!) But I think their goal is to confirm or associate calf SHAPE with calving ease instead of relying strictly on birth weight. I would like to see them go one step further and measure head circumference AND shoulder and hip circumference to find a correlation between head, shoulder, and hip size in conjunction with birth difficulty.