They just can't raise the number cause they want to or make up a number. In the show world alot of the shorthorns have a negative number or a low number compared to alot of the big milker shorthorns that are sold for the purpose of improving milk amount in a herd. Those low or negative milk numbers on Shorthorns don't bother me because Shorthorns are great milkers, so a little below average milk amount to an average Shorthorn is not much.wyatt said:yeh i get that they dont compare breeds but why wouldnt they raise the number into the positives to look better cuz alot are negatives
(clapping) (clapping) (clapping) (clapping)sjcattleco said:I would not even look at EPD's especially for milk Milk is a function of frame size. more milk = bigger cattle. Also if you are now dealing with cattle that are of some very old genetics or if they are linebred the EPS's generated are meaningless. Breed cattle that are good solid functional cattle and you can ignore EPDs forever and never be disappointed!
Thank you, this is a much better explanation of how milk epd's are calculated. A bull has to have females in service in order to have any kind of accuracy.-XBAR- said:Milk EPD has nothing to do with volume of milk produced nor does it have anything to do with frame or mature size.
The dairy industry measures the success of a cow in pounds of milk produced and the nutritional attributes or fat content of the milk. Research has shown that the nutritional quality of milk offered by a beef cow is just as important as the amount produced in generating heavier calves. Since beef cattle breeders don’t milk our cows, success is measured in pounds of calf attributed to milk at weaning. A bull’s Milk EPD is determined by his daughter’s ability to wean heavier calves than her contemporaries. Just because a cow weans the heaviest calf every year, does not necessarily mean her Milk EPD should be the highest in the herd. The performance of her calf could be attributed to the dam’s or sire’s growth genetics or a number of other environmental factors eliminated in the EPD calculation (age of dam, birth date, etc.). Shorthorn breed average Milk EPD (sires) is +2.4.
At this stage, I agree the EPDs are rather suspect BUT fortunately, for those taking the proactive approach of enrolling in the WHR, the numbers will no longer be formulated out of thin air but by actual performance data in relationship to contemporaries.
Another really good point. I would much rather have a moderate sized udder that is tight up to the cow instead of huge and asking for trouble. These cows that have small udders with more maternal traits can perform just as well as the large uddered cows. That's what I am seeing.cbcr said:It is true that in the dairy industry that cows milk is measured in pounds and also the components of fat and protein. Some breeds are able to produce milk that is better suited to cheese making than others. Some of these same traits can also be found in beef cattle.
We have been researching a few things and as for the milk EPD, it may not be as much of a factor in how well a cow milks or her calf performs. How many of you have seen cows that appear not to have a vary big udder but can wean off a large calf? How about the cow that looks like she should be in a dairy but yet her calf doesn't perform as well?
The secret may be in the milk and traits that are associated with the milk. Leptin, and the Casien's (there are a few of them), and their may be some other traits.