US whites now losing majority in under 5 age group. N/C

Help Support Steer Planet:

Doc

Well-known member
Joined
Apr 13, 2007
Messages
3,636
Location
Cottontown, Tennessee
This has some interesting numbers.

US whites now losing majority in under-5 age group
Associated PressBy HOPE YEN | Associated Press – 2 hrs 20 mins ago
Email0Share34Share2Print
Related ContentChart shows population projections by race and ethnicityView PhotoChart shows population projections …
WASHINGTON (AP) — For the first time, America's racial and ethnic minorities now make up about half of the under-5 age group, the government said Thursday. It's a historic shift that shows how young people are at the forefront of sweeping changes by race and class.

The new census estimates, a snapshot of the U.S. population as of July 2012, comes a year after the Census Bureau reported that whites had fallen to a minority among babies. Fueled by immigration and high rates of birth, particularly among Hispanics, racial and ethnic minorities are now growing more rapidly in numbers than whites.

Based on current rates of growth, whites in the under-5 group are expected to tip to a minority this year or next, Thomas Mesenbourg, the Census Bureau's acting director, said.

The government also projects that in five years, minorities will make up more than half of children under 18. Not long after, the total U.S. white population will begin an inexorable decline in absolute numbers, due to aging baby boomers.

The imminent tip to a white minority among young children adds a racial dimension to government spending on early-childhood education, such as President Barack Obama's proposal to significantly expand pre-kindergarten for lower-income families. The nation's demographic changes are already stirring discussion as to whether some civil rights-era programs, such as affirmative action in college admissions, should be retooled to focus more on income rather than race and ethnicity. The Supreme Court will rule on the issue this month.

Studies show that gaps in achievement by both race and class begin long before college, suggesting that U.S. remedies to foster equal opportunity will need to reach earlier into a child's life.

"The educational system is likely to be the most widely used and most acceptable policy tool we have for equalizing life chances. But it does not seem so far to achieve this goal," said Timothy Smeeding, an economics professor at the University of Wisconsin-Madison who specializes in income inequality. "This specter of unequal opportunity may be the biggest negative social outcome of the continuing American inequality boom."

The gap between rich and poor in the U.S. has now stretched to its widest since 1970, making opportunities to reach the middle class increasingly difficult.

Longer-term changes in family structure, such as a decline in marriage, have led to a rise in single-mother households across all racial groups, with the fastest growth now occurring among whites. More than 40 percent of newborns are now born out of wedlock, in families more likely to be low income.

The latest census numbers show:

—The population younger than 5 stood at 49.9 percent minority in 2012.

—For the first time in more than a century, the number of deaths now exceeds births among white Americans. This "natural decrease" occurred several years before the government's original projection, a sign of the white population decline soon to arrive. For now, the white population is still increasing slightly, due to immigration from Europe.

—As a whole, the nonwhite population increased by 1.9 percent to 116 million, or 37 percent of the U.S. The fastest percentage growth is among multiracial Americans, followed by Asians and Hispanics. Non-Hispanic whites make up 63 percent of the U.S.; Hispanics, 17 percent; blacks, 12.3 percent; Asians, 5 percent; and multiracial Americans, 2.4 percent.

—About 353 of the nation's 3,143 counties, or 11 percent, are now "majority-minority." Six of those counties tipped to that status last year: Mecklenburg, N.C.; Cherokee, Okla.; Texas, Okla.; Bell, Texas; Hockley, Texas; and Terrell, Texas.

—In 2012, 13 states and the District of Columbia had an under-5 age population that was "majority-minority," up from five states in 2000. In 25 states and the District of Columbia, minorities now make up more than 40 percent of the under-5 group.

—Among the under-5 age group, 22 percent live in poverty, typically in more rural states such as Mississippi, Arkansas and Louisiana. Black toddlers were most likely to be poor, at 41 percent, followed by Hispanics at 32 percent and whites at 13 percent. Asian toddlers had a poverty rate of 11 percent.

"More so than ever, we need to recognize the importance of young minorities for the growth and vitality of our labor force and economy," said William H. Frey, a demographer at the Brookings Institution who analyzed the census data.

Smeeding's analysis of the latest research and data on social mobility, provided to The Associated Press, shows that a child's achievement varies widely depending on a parent's education and income. The reason: More educated parents tend to have fewer children and generally earn more money than before, allowing them to spend larger amounts of time or money on a child's development, including music or art classes, extra tutoring, or travel and summer camps.

The gaps in achievement tend to emerge early in childhood, continuing through high school, and disparities are especially evident in SAT admission scores. College Board data show that average scores spread as wide as 130-140 points in each of the reading, math and writing sections for a student with family income of less than $20,000, compared with a student with family income exceeding $200,000.

About 40 percent of whites age 25-29 graduate from college, compared with 15 percent for Latinos and 23 percent for blacks.

Obama proposed expanding pre-K education for any 4-year-old whose family income was below twice the federal poverty rate, or $46,000 for a family of four. That is an increasingly minority age group that would benefit from what Obama calls the single most effective way to boost educational outcomes.

The plan would be paid for by a nearly $1 per pack federal cigarette tax. But at a time of strapped federal budgets, Republican lawmakers have been reluctant to expand the scope of government or raise new taxes. Medicare and Social Security costs due to aging of the mostly white baby boomer generation are also adding to the government burden.

A recent Rutgers University study found that state funding for pre-K programs had its largest drop ever last year, with states now spending less per child than a decade ago.

___

 

knabe

Well-known member
Joined
Feb 7, 2007
Messages
13,643
Location
Hollister, CA
Whites must fund their demographic elimination. Anything else is racist.

Immigration from white countries is discouraged. We need more people who want and expect handouts and will never understand the constitution or liberty.
 

BTDT

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 26, 2013
Messages
443
So if a majority becomes a minority, does that come along with all the benefits of a minority group? Special scholarships? Special loan requirements? Special treatment for government programs?
Will the "United Caucasian Fund" be started because a "mind is a terrible thing to waste"?

Another thought: Why? Is it because caucasian people are busy climbing the ladder of success and do not want to be bothered with children?  Are the caucasians too busy trying to support minorities/immigrants so they can not afford a family of their own?  Are the "minorities" multiplying because they get gov't assistance or because they are finally in a country that allows them to be successful and therefore be comfortable to have a family?
Just curious to everyone's thoughts on the reason why the minority and majority populations are flipped.

 

Doc

Well-known member
Joined
Apr 13, 2007
Messages
3,636
Location
Cottontown, Tennessee
BTDT said:
So if a majority becomes a minority, does that come along with all the benefits of a minority group? Special scholarships? Special loan requirements? Special treatment for government programs?
Will the "United Caucasian Fund" be started because a "mind is a terrible thing to waste"?

Another thought: Why? Is it because caucasian people are busy climbing the ladder of success and do not want to be bothered with children?  Are the caucasians too busy trying to support minorities/immigrants so they can not afford a family of their own?  Are the "minorities" multiplying because they get gov't assistance or because they are finally in a country that allows them to be successful and therefore be comfortable to have a family?
Just curious to everyone's thoughts on the reason why the minority and majority populations are flipped.

Brought up some good points.
 

garybob

Well-known member
Joined
Feb 4, 2007
Messages
1,634
Location
NW Arkansas
Doc said:
BTDT said:
So if a majority becomes a minority, does that come along with all the benefits of a minority group? Special scholarships? Special loan requirements? Special treatment for government programs?
Will the "United Caucasian Fund" be started because a "mind is a terrible thing to waste"?

Another thought: Why? Is it because caucasian people are busy climbing the ladder of success and do not want to be bothered with children?  Are the caucasians too busy trying to support minorities/immigrants so they can not afford a family of their own?  Are the "minorities" multiplying because they get gov't assistance or because they are finally in a country that allows them to be successful and therefore be comfortable to have a family?
Just curious to everyone's thoughts on the reason why the minority and majority populations are flipped.

Brought up some good points.
One other thing, that I notice.....there are way more Multi-racial children in this  population than many may think. How many Hispanic, Asian, and Indigenous NorthAmerican children, are there, that actually have one Caucasian Parent??

GB
 

knabe

Well-known member
Joined
Feb 7, 2007
Messages
13,643
Location
Hollister, CA
why do you think they want to know who has guns.

just wait for all the felony exemptions.
 

Gargan

Well-known member
Joined
Feb 24, 2011
Messages
3,067
Location
West Virginia
-XBAR- said:
Gargan said:
Another victory for liberals and illegal immigration in Arizona. How do we stop this?
http://www.wzzm13.com/news/article/259086/2/Supreme-Court-rules-against-strict-voting-rules

Open the borders.  If illegals are competing for your job, I think it's safe to say you SQUANDERED your taxpayer provided education.
My education was paid for out of pocket if you were referring directly to me. My job required reasoning, communication skills, elbow grease, and dealing. Not real worried about an illegal taking my job, but I am worried about them having the same rights and 10 fold population #'s as the working class American's  <rock>
 

RyanChandler

Well-known member
Joined
Jul 6, 2011
Messages
3,457
Location
Pottsboro, TX
Gargan said:
-XBAR- said:
Gargan said:
Another victory for liberals and illegal immigration in Arizona. How do we stop this?
http://www.wzzm13.com/news/article/259086/2/Supreme-Court-rules-against-strict-voting-rules

Open the borders.  If illegals are competing for your job, I think it's safe to say you SQUANDERED your taxpayer provided education.
My education was paid for out of pocket if you were referring directly to me. My job required reasoning, communication skills, elbow grease, and dealing. Not real worried about an illegal taking my job, but I am worried about them having the same rights and 10 fold population #'s as the working class American's  <rock>

You paid out of pocket for elementary schooling? Those sound like highly specialized skills you've acquired there; doubt any of those Meskins would know what any of that reasonin stuff is  ::)  news flash: immigrants are the working class.  Caucasians future will be in service and technology.  Either evolve or die.
 

Gargan

Well-known member
Joined
Feb 24, 2011
Messages
3,067
Location
West Virginia
Newsflash Ryan, we're talking about illegal immigrants here. Stay with the topic. None of us would be here if it weren't for legal immigrants, unless you are American Indian. You should work for the liberal media the way u try to twist things around.
 

RyanChandler

Well-known member
Joined
Jul 6, 2011
Messages
3,457
Location
Pottsboro, TX
I twisted nothing.  Illegal immigrants make up (part of) the working class. 


working class
n.
The socioeconomic class consisting of people who work for wages, especially low wages, including unskilled and semiskilled laborers and their families.
 

BTDT

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 26, 2013
Messages
443
Gargan said:
Newsflash Ryan, we're talking about illegal immigrants here. Stay with the topic. None of us would be here if it weren't for legal immigrants, unless you are American Indian. You should work for the liberal media the way u try to twist things around.

Did you mean ILLEGAL immigrants? If so, that is incorrect. My ancestors came here LEGALLY. Learned the english language, settled the land, and "founded" this country. They did nothing illegal, broke no laws, stole no identities, nor did they fly another countries flag, speak a foreign language, maintain another countries traditions, or send money back to the "home land".

I take strong exception when someone states "our country was founded on illegal immigration", because that is simply not correct.

 

knabe

Well-known member
Joined
Feb 7, 2007
Messages
13,643
Location
Hollister, CA
education is paid for somewhat indirectly out of pocket through property tax.

one way to increase property tax is to enforce occupancy density laws.

on my road, there are people living out of barns in three residences.

parking, garbage, safety, theft, property damage, water usage, upkeep are a concern.
 

Doc

Well-known member
Joined
Apr 13, 2007
Messages
3,636
Location
Cottontown, Tennessee
BTDT said:
Gargan said:
Newsflash Ryan, we're talking about illegal immigrants here. Stay with the topic. None of us would be here if it weren't for legal immigrants, unless you are American Indian. You should work for the liberal media the way u try to twist things around.

Did you mean ILLEGAL immigrants? If so, that is incorrect. My ancestors came here LEGALLY. Learned the english language, settled the land, and "founded" this country. They did nothing illegal, broke no laws, stole no identities, nor did they fly another countries flag, speak a foreign language, maintain another countries traditions, or send money back to the "home land".

I take strong exception when someone states "our country was founded on illegal immigration", because that is simply not correct.

He said LEGAL immigrants!! That none of us would be here if it wasn't for them.
 

garybob

Well-known member
Joined
Feb 4, 2007
Messages
1,634
Location
NW Arkansas
Doc said:
BTDT said:
Gargan said:
Newsflash Ryan, we're talking about illegal immigrants here. Stay with the topic. None of us would be here if it weren't for legal immigrants, unless you are American Indian. You should work for the liberal media the way u try to twist things around.

Did you mean ILLEGAL immigrants? If so, that is incorrect. My ancestors came here LEGALLY. Learned the english language, settled the land, and "founded" this country. They did nothing illegal, broke no laws, stole no identities, nor did they fly another countries flag, speak a foreign language, maintain another countries traditions, or send money back to the "home land".

I take strong exception when someone states "our country was founded on illegal immigration", because that is simply not correct.

He said LEGAL immigrants!! That none of us would be here if it wasn't for them.
Yes, but, back then, all an Immigrant had to do, was basically show-up & behave. What's it cost, nowadays? Do you know what's involved in doing it right, or at least, getting your ducks in a row once you've been here and saved-up your money to catch things up?\

You can't afford what it costs, when you pick tomatoes for a living.

GB

 

RyanChandler

Well-known member
Joined
Jul 6, 2011
Messages
3,457
Location
Pottsboro, TX
knabe said:
education is paid for somewhat indirectly out of pocket through property tax.

one way to increase property tax is to enforce occupancy density laws.

on my road, there are people living out of barns in three residences.

parking, garbage, safety, theft, property damage, water usage, upkeep are a concern.

So you feel enforcing additional legislation will now somehow enable these people to occupy single family residency?
 

knabe

Well-known member
Joined
Feb 7, 2007
Messages
13,643
Location
Hollister, CA
-XBAR- said:
So you feel enforcing additional legislation will now somehow enable these people to occupy single family residency?

No. As usual, we don't need additional laws. We just need to enforce the ones we have.
 
Top