ska said:can you please send a link where i can learn about it?
mark tenenbaum said:What are the odds if a sire is PHA pos but DS clean on a DS female O0
Medium Rare said:The first two were very expensive lessons learned by those of us who played the game before the tests were readily available.
I'd suggest not even considering using a carrier on a carrier and even avoid mixing a PHA carrier with a DS carrier as well. While a ds calf isn't death, like TH and PHA can be, it's often still a cripple that easily could have been avoided. A lot of people ignore DS as it generally doesn't display without the help of PHA, but I'm guessing most of them have never seen a pen with several ds affected calves in it. There are other defects at play as well. They're just not as highly advertised as these three.
If you do some searching on here. you'll probably find more reading on the subject than you can absorb in a week.//// Is it proven that a PHA carrier that is tested DS free carries the same probablity of DS outcome on another DS animal as a DS on a DS?
mark tenenbaum said:Is it proven that a PHA carrier that is tested DS free carries the same probablity of DS outcome on another DS animal as a DS on a DS?
aj said:I thought that the PHA deal was an additive factor only. It only made the DS leg defect more severe.......when two DS carriers were matched and a resulting defect occured. I don't think PHA is the same as DS.//// Thats the qurstion O0