KSanburg
Well-known member
Look at RL-19 as well
knabe said:The new town shooter applied to purchase a gun but refused a background check.
What was the followup?
No assault rifle was used.
Why are we not banning hand guns.
Under current hipaa law health information,ie mental health status can not be given.
Of course dhs is inquiring about exceptions.
I wonder how easy to get on and hard to get off that list it will be.
In California, we are already taking people's guns away.
With lowered thresholds for felonies that will be an issue as well.
People are clueless just how far democrats want to go with gunk control and how tenuous the 2nd amendment is especially on the supreme court. // The new town shooter used mommies guns-and hes an example of the basic tennent that you cant control them all-not sure if mental health and criminal background wouldnt merge in some types of background checks:I guess my question is-would you allow a known pediphile to have a gun? Just a different twist on the same old worn out deal. O0
Mtnman said:Saw this morning on the news were some wack job run a car into a restaurant in Las Vegas injuring several people (didn't see where anyone was killed) so where is the out cry for banning large capacity gas tanks? Or limiting the amount of gas you can purchase depending on where you plan to travel? Oh yeah in this instance the driver is at fault where if it had been a gun it would have been the guns fault! And by in large the incident will go largely unreported where if it had been a gun every news channel and politician would have been on their soap box demonizing guns!/// Dont see the logic in what you are saying-other than someone who is a habitual bad driver or does crazy S4578t like driving into a reastaraunt loses thier license,goes to jail,or if the cops show and the driver tries a run at them-gets OFFED. We had another (murders and robberies happen 7-10 times a day in boggieland) attempted home invasion yesturday in PG County -on a retired police officer-whoblew away one of them trying to push through the door and hit the other as he was running. There were reublican ANTI GUN CONTROL nieghbors-and little old lady Democrats-who cheered when the kinda cuntry poeleeseman said THIS IS CLEARLY SELF DEFENSE-no investigation of the victim needed,no charges will be filed-about 5 minutes after he got there.I was cheering right along-he had every right to defend his home-and I hope the niggero he shot had time to think about it . So-once again-its not about taking all your guns away and defending your home-WHICH EVEN THE police chief alluded to on further comments,-its mainly about trying to keep tabs on a portion of those people who may not be felons yatta yatta-but might have a history of minor assaults-domestic violence ,or a profile of -what have you,and could get dangerous. I have known several cops:including one in my immediate family: who feel that this is necessary-and they risk thier lives every day and face people who would kill them,-not just strut around around in camo-outfits spouting childish crap about the govt. takeover. O0
mark tenenbaum said:Mtnman said:Saw this morning on the news were some wack job run a car into a restaurant in Las Vegas injuring several people (didn't see where anyone was killed) so where is the out cry for banning large capacity gas tanks? Or limiting the amount of gas you can purchase depending on where you plan to travel? Oh yeah in this instance the driver is at fault where if it had been a gun it would have been the guns fault! And by in large the incident will go largely unreported where if it had been a gun every news channel and politician would have been on their soap box demonizing guns!/// Dont see the logic in what you are saying-other than someone who is a habitual bad driver or does crazy S4578t like driving into a reastaraunt loses thier license,goes to jail,or if the cops show and the driver tries a run at them-gets OFFED. We had another (murders and robberies happen 7-10 times a day in boggieland) attempted home invasion yesturday in PG County -on a retired police officer-whoblew away one of them trying to push through the door and hit the other as he was running. There were reublican ANTI GUN CONTROL nieghbors-and little old lady Democrats-who cheered when the kinda ****ry poeleeseman said THIS IS CLEARLY SELF DEFENSE-no investigation of the victim needed,no charges will be filed-about 5 minutes after he got there.I was cheering right along-he had every right to defend his home-and I hope the *****o he shot had time to think about it . So-once again-its not about taking all your guns away and defending your home-WHICH EVEN THE police chief alluded to on further comments,-its mainly about trying to keep tabs on a portion of those people who may not be felons yatta yatta-but might have a history of minor assaults-domestic violence ,or a profile of -what have you,and could get dangerous. I have known several cops:including one in my immediate family: who feel that this is necessary-and they risk thier lives every day and face people who would kill them,-not just strut around around in camo-outfits spouting childish crap about the govt. takeover. O0
commercialfarmer said:mark tenenbaum said:Mtnman said:Saw this morning on the news were some wack job run a car into a restaurant in Las Vegas injuring several people (didn't see where anyone was killed) so where is the out cry for banning large capacity gas tanks? Or limiting the amount of gas you can purchase depending on where you plan to travel? Oh yeah in this instance the driver is at fault where if it had been a gun it would have been the guns fault! And by in large the incident will go largely unreported where if it had been a gun every news channel and politician would have been on their soap box demonizing guns!/// Dont see the logic in what you are saying-other than someone who is a habitual bad driver or does crazy S4578t like driving into a reastaraunt loses thier license,goes to jail,or if the cops show and the driver tries a run at them-gets OFFED. We had another (murders and robberies happen 7-10 times a day in boggieland) attempted home invasion yesturday in PG County -on a retired police officer-whoblew away one of them trying to push through the door and hit the other as he was running. There were reublican ANTI GUN CONTROL nieghbors-and little old lady Democrats-who cheered when the kinda ****ry poeleeseman said THIS IS CLEARLY SELF DEFENSE-no investigation of the victim needed,no charges will be filed-about 5 minutes after he got there.I was cheering right along-he had every right to defend his home-and I hope the *****o he shot had time to think about it . So-once again-its not about taking all your guns away and defending your home-WHICH EVEN THE police chief alluded to on further comments,-its mainly about trying to keep tabs on a portion of those people who may not be felons yatta yatta-but might have a history of minor assaults-domestic violence ,or a profile of -what have you,and could get dangerous. I have known several cops:including one in my immediate family: who feel that this is necessary-and they risk thier lives every day and face people who would kill them,-not just strut around around in camo-outfits spouting childish crap about the govt. takeover. O0
If you will give us the decipher code, I would be happy to reply. Honestly can't tell what you're saying half the time.
Gargan said:http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2013/04/02/senators-vow-to-oppose-un-arms-trade-treaty/
Remember what I said about the UN anyone? This is where our gun control may come from.// Well-with the US being the largest arms dealer in the world voting for it-and our wonderfull allies IRAN,North Korea,etc voting against it-this is obviously directed at arms dealers-countries supplying terrorist organizations-who are going after every body and anything that isnt Muslim-well not exactly-if you aint the right kind of Muslim-they are gonna kill you too-or for whatever fantasy crosses thier minds at the time. I think it makes sense to cut off arms to terrorists-unless they turn them on Iran,Nort Korea etc-so maybe enlighten me what this has to do with guns in our country;unless the NRA is actually in with the rugbeeter terrorists-I DONT THINK SO-and as an aside-I think thier idea about guarding schools is unoriginal-Im the one who suggested months ago about our vets guarding schools-and mow down the first creep who tries anyhting (lol) O0 LOL O0
-XBAR- said:If you applied that logic across the board there wouldn't be any laws. /// Youre right-but laws and logic,and maintaining some kind of order (even in a small way) seem to given way to two opposing camps-the thing I dont get is that people arent listening to the law enforcement guys,and even some of the military people-they are the ones who REALLY DEAL with armed threats first hand-and they are not saying-take away all your weapons etc. Maybe give them some kind of an audit trail where maybe they can solve 1 murder more-or keep one person near the edge from getting a weapon with no effort.Maybe Connetticut is wrong for enacting the new gun laws-and one of the main and vocal people behind it-is a republican. O0
-XBAR- said:If you applied that logic across the board there wouldn't be any laws.
knabe said:-XBAR- said:If you applied that logic across the board there wouldn't be any laws.
Apply the equally opposite absurd extreme.
Really I mean get some debate skills.
knabe said:Never addressing a point is an actual debate skill.
Your deflection doesn't fool me.