RyanChandler
Well-known member
I think it depends which population you're talking about. There's likely been many advantages and disadvantages incorporating Maine influence into the US Shorthorn population. I'm sure the lasting impact is no greater than the (CLEARLY) non shorthorn Irish influence cattle had on the Canadian SH population (and US alike).
Just as the non shorthorn influence was visually apparent in the Maine influenced bulls, Mark was referring to, that made their way to Canada, the NON BRITISH influence in the Irish cattle was/is just as apparent.
At the time the herd book opened, I think the Maine influence saved the breed here. From what I read and from seeing the type of SHs (scotch puds) that were prevalent at this time, it's clear the breed needing something to take them in a different direction and FAST.
Now do I think this could have been done using the Canadian Shorthorns? Likely yes... but what about w/o the Irish influence in these Canadian cattle? Likely not. (Are there Canadian SH's out there w/ no Irish?)
Today, with the number of registered SH cattle both in the US and Canada, I see no justification for keeping the herd book open. There is no Fullblood Maine bull that offers me anything that I can't already get in a purebred SH package. The only positive attribute I see in the cattle is their ability to inject substance/growth into their offspring...but like others have said-- "at what cost" (their udders turn me off the most).
Currently, over 40 years after the initial infusions, there is a long long long list of purebred bulls (w/o Irish or maine influence doubtful) that inject more than enough growth for us to still need to be infusing Fullblood Maines.
Just as the non shorthorn influence was visually apparent in the Maine influenced bulls, Mark was referring to, that made their way to Canada, the NON BRITISH influence in the Irish cattle was/is just as apparent.
At the time the herd book opened, I think the Maine influence saved the breed here. From what I read and from seeing the type of SHs (scotch puds) that were prevalent at this time, it's clear the breed needing something to take them in a different direction and FAST.
Now do I think this could have been done using the Canadian Shorthorns? Likely yes... but what about w/o the Irish influence in these Canadian cattle? Likely not. (Are there Canadian SH's out there w/ no Irish?)
Today, with the number of registered SH cattle both in the US and Canada, I see no justification for keeping the herd book open. There is no Fullblood Maine bull that offers me anything that I can't already get in a purebred SH package. The only positive attribute I see in the cattle is their ability to inject substance/growth into their offspring...but like others have said-- "at what cost" (their udders turn me off the most).
Currently, over 40 years after the initial infusions, there is a long long long list of purebred bulls (w/o Irish or maine influence doubtful) that inject more than enough growth for us to still need to be infusing Fullblood Maines.