-XBAR- said:Tallcool1 said:To me, what makes those two scenarios different is the spirit of the transaction. If the spirit of the transaction is for the trader/producer to live through an exhibitor and put a whipping on everyone each weekend, that is wrong. If the spirit of the transaction is for the trader/producer to extend an act of kindness and give a helping hand to a deserving exhibitor or family with NO regard for the ultimate success in the show ring, then I am all for it.
I think you have to keep in mind that the success that calf has is a reflection on the breeder just as much as the kid showing it. I wouldn't 'loan' out a calf that I didn't think was going to be competitive. The promotion of 'my stock' would be one of the incentives for me to engage in that type of arrangement. The first steer I ever showed was "sponsored" by one of our subs. The only stipulation was that I had to put a sign advertising his ranch where my calf was stalled. I don't see anything wrong w/ this. It's a win - win.
I hear ya on the part about not loaning out a calf that wouldn't be competitive. However, in my mind a middle of the pack calf IS competitive to a kid or family that really doesn't have the financial ability to buy one at all.
As far as loaning or leasing out a calf that is capable of going to the backdrop week in and week out......don't do it. If the calf is that good, there is no way it is worth the risk. Either sell the calf and turn it into cash, or keep her at home where she is safe. That is the way I would look at it if she was mine.
Again, I am the one that has already said that the quality of the calf is a deal breaker for me.
We don't have to agree on this. These are just my opinions.