Till-Hill said:
trevorgreycattleco said:
The objective cattle or the BC Matrix cattle are also the same way. Breeding for numbers doesn't ever seem to work. Remember HARB Pendelton? Quaker Hill Objective? I have never cared for the In Focus bull.
What's wrong with Pendleton and Objective? I know Pendleton's numbers went down but I have been using him since I was at Harrison's. My commercial producers LOVE THEM! They come easy and grow like a weed. My go to Angus bull is an Objective x 6595 and besides a little bigger bw than what I want he is my go to bull. Daughters raise a calf and can look good doing it and steers come off the cow without feed huge.
Objective is a lot the way I described In Focus, but with two huge exceptions. About 1/3 or better of Objective daughters will be flat awesome cows, if they are sound and can travel on their feet and legs. Not just flat awesome, but make you salivate type of awesome. He gets a lot of flack about the slab sided nature, but he has made some really nice cows. The second big exception is the disposition. Most are ok, but when you get a hot one, watch out. They are hot like kill everything in sight kind of hot. They can make a rank EXT daughter look like a kitten. Those cattle scan off the charts and grow like weeds, but you won't see many show winners out of them.
Pendleton has really fallen off in his numbers. I haven't seen enough to comment otherwise.
These cattle have a place, but make sure you know what you are using them for. If you are breeding up a bunch of cattle for show calves, you will be sorely disappointed. If you are sending them to a feedyard, you will likely be pretty happy.