knabe
Well-known member
appreciate the comments show heifer and agree. i have two friends from high school who killed people in high school while drunk. another, a champion motocrosser, who was killed by a drunk driver, and a couple others. my comments are simply that there are no absolutes, and with our society going towards a 0 tolerance, it is leading us down a path of !@^$%@^@. it is well proven that the majority of drunk drivers who kill, not all grant you, but the vast majority, abuse alchohol contiually, drive on suspended licenses etc. we focus our attention on the ones that can be measured by a machine which may not be accurate with a zero tolerance,( it is the only "crime" where you are presumed guilty in court), but won't use that same zero tolerance for those who have been arrested repeatedly for not only driving drunk, but who have also caused accidents, killed people. we are filling up our court systems with drug offenders and alchohol related offenses at the expense of crimes of violence. our jails and courts are a mirror of what we choose to enforce and penalize. i am just saying we are letting too many aggregeous crimes are not getting their attention because we have a system that discriminates based on bed space. if it were up to me, i would change drunk driving laws (and drugs for that matter) to maximize an increasing fee based system, enforceable by docking your pay immediately with little court time if any at all. similar to speeding tickets, except the fee is huge. increasing penalties logarithmically (more than linearly) for repeat offenses. for those that are "sick", and refuse to cooperate, i guess we can only do what we have always done, elect them for the senate! i realize this doesn't address all the enforcement areas, i'm just saying that 0.08 needs to be looked at again, otherwise we will be looking at interlocks and paying a pedestrian to breath into it so we can be on our way, raising the cost of everything, with no real change in statistics, which, haven't changed in a while, no matter all the enforcement, yet we clog our courts and jails, forcing us to set free violent criminals and shorten their sentences. i do agree some can see that drunk driving is violent. i need a scott translation here. i would like to see more focus on repeat offenders, since statistics bear out they kill more, and are at a
the average drunk driver has a blood alchohol content of 0.16
8 drinks in an hour for a 200 lb man will give you a 0.16
Fatalities from drunk driving dropped from estimates as high as 70 percent of all highway fatalities in the mid-1980s to around 50 percent today. Chronic alcoholics are now the largest cause of drunk driving collisions and it is clear “tougher” laws do not discourage problem drinkers from driving even when they have lost their licenses.
i would like to see us figure out something to do with these people rather than focusing so much attention on the 0.08 people. it's easy to focus on them with the machine, but the chronic ones are the ones that are doing the most of the killing. that 50% number is astonishing. it doesn't receive near 1% of the attention as drunk drivers, or the money, yet an equal number die, with an unequal outrage.
off the box.
the average drunk driver has a blood alchohol content of 0.16
8 drinks in an hour for a 200 lb man will give you a 0.16
Fatalities from drunk driving dropped from estimates as high as 70 percent of all highway fatalities in the mid-1980s to around 50 percent today. Chronic alcoholics are now the largest cause of drunk driving collisions and it is clear “tougher” laws do not discourage problem drinkers from driving even when they have lost their licenses.
i would like to see us figure out something to do with these people rather than focusing so much attention on the 0.08 people. it's easy to focus on them with the machine, but the chronic ones are the ones that are doing the most of the killing. that 50% number is astonishing. it doesn't receive near 1% of the attention as drunk drivers, or the money, yet an equal number die, with an unequal outrage.
off the box.