I guess I'll go ahead and add my two cents.
Jeff, I, and others on this board that seem "jaded" are that way because we've been showing down here for a long time (myself going back to the mid 80s). Texas has tried everything - usually we were so cutting age on it that its old news to us (the whole blood testing thing). As far as DNA testing goes, how many discussions have we had on here about false negatives/positives from the testing labs?
The current Texas steer classification system was developed by the show managers, ag teachers, and county agents. Same crew that came up with the whole slick shearing thing. Both were developed to try and combat the "steer jocks". As far as classification goes, sifters are nominated by ag teachers, county agents, and breed associations. Sifting decisions aren't overtly political, but as with any committee, one strong personality can influence a lot. Even though they are dropping buttons or beans in a blind vote, the other sifters can tell when one another are really giving a certain calf the "evil eye". A few thoughts:
1. As much as I hate having a calf sifted, do you really think you can do a better job picking a 100% angus than what the sifters do. Personally, I think anyone that says they could are pretty much talking out their ***. It isn't easy to decide which polled, solid black, medium muscled and boned calves are Angus and which ones ain't. There are precious few folks involved in breeding black show steers in Texas who haven't sold a crossbred calf to someone that then ran them Angus. We don't open our mouths about it for fear of running off customers, so we need to shut up about the sifters. Remember the old "cast the first stone" rule.
2. There are no innocent parties to the skepticism that has developed on the part of sifters. Most of the sifted calves are fairly sorry exotics whose owners are typically the "half-interested, didn't feed or work with their calf much" kid who knows their calf isn't good enough to place in the crossbred classes - so they know they don't have anything to lose by trying. I got more than irritated at a kid from our county who tried to run the most Chi looking calf as an Angus at San Antonio. I tried to take the high road and explain why they shouldn't and they basically laughed at me. This type of kid/calf combo is compounded on the other extreme by the overt advertisement of winners from crossbred bulls.
3. The best step to probably fixing this is to get off our collective "high horses" about pretending they need to be 100% Angus. The Hereford and Shorthorn folks did and their sifts aren't nearly as vicious as the Angus and Red Angus. Real good Angus and Red Angus calves can run with these crosses that are winning. Judges are backing off of the extreme muscling in a hurry anyway. If your calf is balanced, can move, and is deep bodies you are going to be fine.
4. Another realistic option would involve education of sifters. Get the breed associations involved and get a formal pool of sifters nominated, and then get these guys out to see some real world Angus and Red Angus cattle. That may sound stupid, but I'll bet we'd surprised at how many cattle these guys really look at. I bet it ain't many. Heck, put on a workshop of DNA verified cattle and some crosses and open their eyes as to what's real and what ain't. But that would require money from someone besides an exhibitor.
5. There is no real reason to be scared of buying a good, "real" Angus or Red Angus steer. If you have a good one, you could find a home for it if you tried hard enough. Not everyone is scared of showing them.