chiangus said:Am I right in that if we didn't ai, that these genetic defects would have been bred out quick. Survival of the fittest. However I guess the argument can be made about how can you dramtically improve your herd by outside influence of good bulls as well as cross breeding.
Kinda of scary now that we can take it to the next level and clone. I think this is something God never attended us having a hand in (cloning).
You are sort of right
In order for a genetic defect to rise to the level of concern there must be a certain number of abnormal calves born (this is not an exact number and likely with big ugly dead calves like PHA one would be suspicious before a more subtle defect like this hind limb abnormality we are discussing or like fawn calf in the Angus).
So in order for that certain number of calves to be born with the abnormality there must be a certain frequency of carriers - in general in cattle most genetic defects are inherited as recessives - so you must have 2 carriers mate and then there is a 25% chance with each mating that an abnormal calf will appear
However, with that mating you also have a 50% chance (risk) or getting another carrier - and the carriers are "fit" and actually in some recessive conditions (ie sickle cell anemia in people) there are advantages to the carrier state (in SSA the red cells do not survive long enough for the malaria parasites to reproduce)
So while AI didn't cause the mutations (nature did) AI does allow an individual bull to have progeny all over the country and the world (similar thinking with ET) - which would not happen with natural service - so without AI the mutations would still be there but like in the Battle of the Bull Runts it takes longer for them to raise their ugly heads and without the ability to test for mutations entire families of cattle were eliminated "to rid the breed of the defect" (aj wasn't it the Sunbeam line that was eliminated with Angus dwarfism?)