The way I understand it is that the PHA gene does not have to be present, but the incidence rate of DS is higher if it is. I also understand that if the parents have that "club calf" look, short pasterns, very straight hind legs, etc., the rate of incidence is higher. It doesn't sound like this defect behaves exactly like TH or PHA where if you mate two carriers, you'll get 25% defective, 50% normal, but carrying the gene, and 25% normal without the gene. Perhaps this explains why there is such a variance in visual appearance of the affected calves. The defective calves I have seen range from very deformed to almost looking like a good foot trimming would fix them right up. I'm feeding out a couple of these calves for a friend of mine and there is quite a difference in the two. The roan heifer is so good, maybe I'll trim her feet and advertise her on steer planet. Just kidding. That won't happen. Remember, I am not a scientist and didn't even stay at a Holiday Inn last night.