GONEWEST said:
I just thought that if you had even ever been there, you'd know the solutions you offered weren't practical.
maybe i'm missing something, one of the solutions i offered worked.
the others were preparing ahead, being more observant, etc.
Never seen you stand up for the President here.
obama, hmm. good one. there's a difference here i'll try and delineate (but won't succeed). in one case, someone did a poor job, and could improve along with extenuating circumstances. with obama, he's doing a great job converting to stateism. i wish him the best of luck at converting to stateism as quickly as possible, because at some point, the government will have to tax itself, and when that threshold is passed, then and only then will people understand what is going on. the republicans thought they could do it at a slow pace to fool their constituency that they weren't abandoning free market principles, even though they were. both parties are a single party. obama is not, that i can see, embracing liberty and capitalism. people forget that during the war, a large percentage of gold changed hands to the US at the expense of almost everyone else. this was my point earlier regarding currency devaluation. to me, the loser of WWII was britain, as they were no longer a global superpower. the history of gold from after WWI till we went off the gold standard during nixon's administration and who benefited is interesting.