CAB
Well-known member
Marc, It was hook worms that cost the south the civil war according to Oz. Brent
knabe said:kanshow said:I'm not saying I wouldn't use or keep a carrier - it really depends on the cow, situation, etc. It's just that I feel that there should be disclosure. Look at HYPP and AQHA - right on the papers.
it is on the papers for maine's, indicated with results obtained by parentage (both clear), or by test. i don't know if anyone has ever had their papers indicate a PHAC individual yet.
TJ said:Sadly, some of the percentage Lowlines have been crossed with Shorthorn & Maine's that are "known" PHA & TH carriers. Even a few potenial carriers have been sold at the National Sale. I have never heard the words TH or PHA ever mentioned by a Lowline breeder & it will be a sad day when one of those percentage Lowlines has a PHA or TH calf & the owner will likely be totally clueless as to why it happened. Without education & testing, sooner or later, it will happen & the owner is going to be awfully upset.
That would get pretty expensive having to test everything. That's why I shipped my brother to Sabre, because he tested THC & I didn't want to have to test every calf.Show Heifer said:garybob said:That's why people like DL and myself take our chosen stance on this issue.kanshow said:I just keep thinking of the poor person who is just getting into the breed or a first time calf kid that buys into this problem. Seems like there ought to be some ethics inolved..
GB
Careful garybob, you will get lumped in with DL and I, and you may not want that!!!
I think the maines and shorties should have to require a PHA/TH test regardless of parentage and have the results on the registration paper. That way no "confusion" could be had with clean vs. carrier pedigrees. Plus, never have figured out how some people decide whether it is a AI calf or bull bred calf when they AI then turn the bull out. Hmmmmm.....
dori36 said:TJ said:Sadly, some of the percentage Lowlines have been crossed with Shorthorn & Maine's that are "known" PHA & TH carriers. Even a few potenial carriers have been sold at the National Sale. I have never heard the words TH or PHA ever mentioned by a Lowline breeder & it will be a sad day when one of those percentage Lowlines has a PHA or TH calf & the owner will likely be totally clueless as to why it happened. Without education & testing, sooner or later, it will happen & the owner is going to be awfully upset.
Actually, Rocky Mtn Lowlines (Dana & Rick Sekich) and Melanie Schroeder (my longtime fitter and shower) have talked at length about both PHA and TH. Rocky Mtn is using a few SH's to cross w/Lowline genetics but they have been tested. Maybe it would be a good topic to focus on at next year's banquet/meeting?
CAB said:Duly noted Red. Thank you.
TJ, seeing that LOwlines are relatively a newer breed, why doesn't the breed asso. address the question of PHA & TH now rather than wait for it to become as wide spread as it is in the SHs & Maines. Wouldn't that just make common sense?
Was it posted up on this board about the Durham Red's policing TH, but not policing PHA? If so, that makes no sense to me at all.
dori36 said:TJ said:Sadly, some of the percentage Lowlines have been crossed with Shorthorn & Maine's that are "known" PHA & TH carriers. Even a few potenial carriers have been sold at the National Sale. I have never heard the words TH or PHA ever mentioned by a Lowline breeder & it will be a sad day when one of those percentage Lowlines has a PHA or TH calf & the owner will likely be totally clueless as to why it happened. Without education & testing, sooner or later, it will happen & the owner is going to be awfully upset.
Actually, Rocky Mtn Lowlines (Dana & Rick Sekich) and Melanie Schroeder (my longtime fitter and shower) have talked at length about both PHA and TH. Rocky Mtn is using a few SH's to cross w/Lowline genetics but they have been tested. Maybe it would be a good topic to focus on at next year's banquet/meeting?
DL said:dori36 said:TJ said:Sadly, some of the percentage Lowlines have been crossed with Shorthorn & Maine's that are "known" PHA & TH carriers. Even a few potenial carriers have been sold at the National Sale. I have never heard the words TH or PHA ever mentioned by a Lowline breeder & it will be a sad day when one of those percentage Lowlines has a PHA or TH calf & the owner will likely be totally clueless as to why it happened. Without education & testing, sooner or later, it will happen & the owner is going to be awfully upset.
Actually, Rocky Mtn Lowlines (Dana & Rick Sekich) and Melanie Schroeder (my longtime fitter and shower) have talked at length about both PHA and TH. Rocky Mtn is using a few SH's to cross w/Lowline genetics but they have been tested. Maybe it would be a good topic to focus on at next year's banquet/meeting?
dori & TJ
If you decide to do that I have pictures (video) and other stuff you could use....DL
When this happens, and, it WILL happen, the ENTIRE Shorthorn breed will get blamed (and banned), not just ''carrier lines''. I blame the show-ring people for this.TJ said:DL said:dori36 said:TJ said:Sadly, some of the percentage Lowlines have been crossed with Shorthorn & Maine's that are "known" PHA & TH carriers. Even a few potenial carriers have been sold at the National Sale. I have never heard the words TH or PHA ever mentioned by a Lowline breeder & it will be a sad day when one of those percentage Lowlines has a PHA or TH calf & the owner will likely be totally clueless as to why it happened. Without education & testing, sooner or later, it will happen & the owner is going to be awfully upset.
Actually, Rocky Mtn Lowlines (Dana & Rick Sekich) and Melanie Schroeder (my longtime fitter and shower) have talked at length about both PHA and TH. Rocky Mtn is using a few SH's to cross w/Lowline genetics but they have been tested. Maybe it would be a good topic to focus on at next year's banquet/meeting?
dori & TJ
If you decide to do that I have pictures (video) and other stuff you could use....DL
Thank you! I may be contacting you fairly soon about this issue.
From what I have seen, you blame the show ring people for everything. There doesn't seem to be much about Shorthorns that you DO like, why not find a breed that more "fits" your program?garybob said:When this happens, and, it WILL happen, the ENTIRE Shorthorn breed will get blamed (and banned), not just ''carrier lines''. I blame the show-ring people for this.TJ said:DL said:dori36 said:TJ said:Sadly, some of the percentage Lowlines have been crossed with Shorthorn & Maine's that are "known" PHA & TH carriers. Even a few potenial carriers have been sold at the National Sale. I have never heard the words TH or PHA ever mentioned by a Lowline breeder & it will be a sad day when one of those percentage Lowlines has a PHA or TH calf & the owner will likely be totally clueless as to why it happened. Without education & testing, sooner or later, it will happen & the owner is going to be awfully upset.
Actually, Rocky Mtn Lowlines (Dana & Rick Sekich) and Melanie Schroeder (my longtime fitter and shower) have talked at length about both PHA and TH. Rocky Mtn is using a few SH's to cross w/Lowline genetics but they have been tested. Maybe it would be a good topic to focus on at next year's banquet/meeting?
dori & TJ
If you decide to do that I have pictures (video) and other stuff you could use....DL
Thank you! I may be contacting you fairly soon about this issue.
GB
Ma'am, I would like to see the breed go back to ones in my memeory. Heck, my Grandpa used 'em in his Commercial Herd in the '70's. What about that equates, in your mind, to Me not liking the Shorthorn Breed?Jill said:From what I have seen, you blame the show ring people for everything. There doesn't seem to be much about Shorthorns that you DO like, why not find a breed that more "fits" your program?garybob said:When this happens, and, it WILL happen, the ENTIRE Shorthorn breed will get blamed (and banned), not just ''carrier lines''. I blame the show-ring people for this.TJ said:DL said:dori36 said:TJ said:Sadly, some of the percentage Lowlines have been crossed with Shorthorn & Maine's that are "known" PHA & TH carriers. Even a few potenial carriers have been sold at the National Sale. I have never heard the words TH or PHA ever mentioned by a Lowline breeder & it will be a sad day when one of those percentage Lowlines has a PHA or TH calf & the owner will likely be totally clueless as to why it happened. Without education & testing, sooner or later, it will happen & the owner is going to be awfully upset.
Actually, Rocky Mtn Lowlines (Dana & Rick Sekich) and Melanie Schroeder (my longtime fitter and shower) have talked at length about both PHA and TH. Rocky Mtn is using a few SH's to cross w/Lowline genetics but they have been tested. Maybe it would be a good topic to focus on at next year's banquet/meeting?
dori & TJ
If you decide to do that I have pictures (video) and other stuff you could use....DL
Thank you! I may be contacting you fairly soon about this issue.
GB
Telos said:Knabe, I can't decide which is more disgusting... Your guy with the finger or DL's PHA video? (lol)