garybob
Well-known member
Bump!-XBAR- said:Theres no push for it here bc those claiming 100% shorthorn have nothing to gain from it, and everything to lose.
Bump!-XBAR- said:Theres no push for it here bc those claiming 100% shorthorn have nothing to gain from it, and everything to lose.
coyote said:JIT. I am reminded of a wonderful conversation I had in Scotland with Donald and Diana McGillvary who owned the famed Calrossie Shorthorn herd. When I asked them if there were any Shorthorns left in Scotland that were 100% from the old Scottish lines, Donald replied " I certainly hope not".
I think some of these genetics pictured below, from over that way, are more appealing to me than the Shorthorns they have over there now. It seems to me they have turned the Shorthorn Breed into a terminal breed to compete against the Charolais and Limousine .
DLD said:On the subject of black Shorthorns - I never expected the associations to promote the concept, but I'm a little surprised that someone hasn't tried to start their own breed, a la black Herefords. Not to say that I'm a black Hereford fan - from what little bit of research I've done on it, it looks like a pyramid scheme with cows. No (or at least very little) breeding up to registered black Herefords using the Hereford and Angus genetics of your choice, you have to buy them from the handful of already established herds. With a little more open approach, it could maybe be a niche to be filled... But like black Herefords, it's very doubtful it would ever be more than just a small niche.
caledon101 said:This is very interesting....and educational.
So,Shorthorns in both the USA and the UK infused genetics from outside of the breed to modify the end product and move forward successfully? Did the association in the UK afford any % advantage to the outside breeds being used?....similar to what happened in the USA with Maine Anjou?
Bump! (clapping)garybob said:Bump!-XBAR- said:Theres no push for it here bc those claiming 100% shorthorn have nothing to gain from it, and everything to lose.
caledon101 said:Just curious.....has this subject ever been discussed or raised in North America?? If there is any history to share on this I would enjoy hearing it.
Some non-black breeds with great history and tradition have eliminated colour bias and some have not.
commercialfarmer said:caledon101 said:Just curious.....has this subject ever been discussed or raised in North America?? If there is any history to share on this I would enjoy hearing it.
Some non-black breeds with great history and tradition have eliminated colour bias and some have not.
I've generally noted that when someone makes a defensive statement multiple times without actually being acused of said offense, their tends to be more to the story.
Since you originated the thread on said topic, created a new phrase "eliminated color bias" (which makes my politically correct radar peg full tilt, and if you don't know where political correctness originated- look up USSR and re-education camps i.e making someone politically correct), and follow up with questions that seem to point out the favorable instances of infusion of foreign genetics into the herd, it would make one wonder if there isn't an angle here, but I'm just an old farm boy. Oh, you only said 3 or 4 times, you aren't arguing for it. See first paragraph.
Just to be upfront, I asked the same thing. But i also thought there would be niche for homo black bulls to compete with angus, mostly because of the black premium market that is present, and at the same time, a lot of angus are becoming terminal. Black steers for market and yet retainable heifers with a bit of a heterosis kick back on angus.
To me, angus would be more consistent to short horn than a lot of maines. SH and An are considered British, Maine is continental? Just to throw that in the mix for the pro-affirmative action crowd.
Saying that, I'm not for further mongrelization or dilution of the breed.
Here is where i have further issues with logic in the past regarding maine...
If a breed has to have infusion of another breed to "save" it, you didn't really save it anyway. If generation 2, 3, or 4..... doesn't look like or perform like generation 1, then you don't really have generation 1 breed cattle. You have a cross of varying degrees. You have a cross. And I would then say, that you should have more performance because of heterosis. But will the next guy? Is it sustainable? If so, then your NEW breed maybe better. But why shouldn't an angus producer just not use the infused maine genetics to create their own cross?
Most every commercial producer should have an F1 cow and a terminal bull. And again, I used to think black F1's would be beneficial. Now I don't. I think red angus are catching on. Not because of color, but because of quality. I think SH has some genetics in places that would out produce the reds or at least compliment them very well. My point is that the end producer should have the heterosis, not the seed stock guys. And i think good red is selling just as good as qualty black now.
If angus made black great by advertising, why can't this breed do the same? If angus is just better on the whole, then changing yours to black won't alter anything.
If it is the terminal premium, a go back to create your own, or b let truly terminal breeds have it and just focus on what your good at- mama cow genetics. Last i looked, there are about 30ish cows to every bull in most pastures anyway. I'd rather have that market.
Let that sink in for a minute.
But then again im tired so none of this may make sense. (thumbsup)
caledon101 said:Best definition I could find: Political correctness is the alteration of language to redress real or alleged injustices and discrimination or to avoid offense.
And yes, I am actually thinking of breeding my purebred Shorts to a black sire with the goal of creating some Shorthorn Plus progeny. Not much of a Shorthorn bull market in my part of the continent so why not try something a little different??
Hey, CF....not trying to be confrontational towards you!
And yes, I know what it's like to have a new baby in the house.....been there, done that and it was the best thing in the world but as you know, you never sleep the same from the day they come home from the hospital. The fact you aren't getting your sleep means you are a good husband and a caring Dad!
Never heard of a Black Purebred Shorthorn.....hence my original question. Wasn't aware of any previous efforts both here and abroad to develop the concept.
Wasn't taking a position for the concept...or against. I was trying to learn of any possible history surrounding this.
IMO, to include a reference excluding or reducing % values in the By-Laws based on hair coat colour would qualify as a "bias". Every college professor in the world keeps telling us it's only hair colour; it has no economic value and, once the hide is off you can't tell what colour the animal was.
I have heard the Mamma Cow reference many times before...just kidding with you on that!
Have a super day.
caledon101 said:Best definition I could find: Political correctness is the alteration of language to redress real or alleged injustices and discrimination or to avoid offense.
aj said:As far as chasing a black hide for Shorties.......for the short run it's to late. it would take 20 years to get some good purebred black shorties. Long term maybe. There may be more emphasis for lighter colored cattle for heat reasons.......down the road.: PROPHETIC WORDS-the weather changes and sustained drauths are here-and AINT going away.I hate to see the damage being done-but some cattle are going to have to survive a pretty brutal existance in what "was" cattle country O0
aj said:One good thing about the purebred Show Shorthorns.........there is a significantly higher death loss during the partuition process. This kills off receipt cows,reduces, cattle numbers and then drives up cattle prices.